Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: It's MONDAY for SCOTUS ruling on SAF's Chicago gun case

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    1,863

    Post imported post

    Chill up the champagne.



    It's Monday for SCOTUS ruling in SAF's McDonald v. Chicago case

    This isliable to be a long weekend for anti-gunners, whomay spend their time trying to figure out how to spin an adverseruling,and a pretty busy Monday for the people at SAF's Bellevue offices if the case goes as court observers predict.



    http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m6d24-Its-Monday-for-SCOTUS-ruling-in-SAFs-McDonald-v-Chicago-case

    Or try this:

    http://tinyurl.com/29g8458

  2. #2
    Regular Member SaintJacque's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Federal Way, Washington, USA
    Posts
    139

    Post imported post

    Dave Workman wrote:
    Chill up the champagne.



    It's Monday for SCOTUS ruling in SAF's McDonald v. Chicago case

    This isliable to be a long weekend for anti-gunners, whomay spend their time trying to figure out how to spin an adverseruling,and a pretty busy Monday for the people at SAF's Bellevue offices if the case goes as court observers predict.



    http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m6d24-Its-Monday-for-SCOTUS-ruling-in-SAFs-McDonald-v-Chicago-case

    Or try this:

    http://tinyurl.com/29g8458
    I'm really hoping this decision goes well for us. If it does, it could do so much to advance this important liberty in cities and states all over the country.

    Here's to the Second Amendment!

  3. #3
    Newbie crisisweasel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Pima County, Arizona, USA
    Posts
    266

    Post imported post

    Your Examiner articles are, as always, appreciated Dave. They provide excellent summaries and provide focus.

    Let's hope this one goes our way.

  4. #4
    Campaign Veteran skidmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Chesterfield VA
    Posts
    10,682
    I'm also holding my breath for the McDonald decision, but I'm just not convinced that there will be much use for champane, chilled or otherwise.

    There is no reason not to expect "reasonable restrictions", just as there is no reason to expect "privileges and immunities" in the decision. I'm not sure if strict scrutiny will even be discussed, let alone the standard set. And as icing on the cake, there is the possibility that SCOTUS will find a way to issue an unpublished opinion - meaning it will not be presedent and thus not "the law of the land".

    Anybody that believes that McDonald is the end of the line, rather than the starting point for a long series of battles, has been drinking unicorn farts. "Fasten your safety belts, boys, it's going to be a bumpy ride" was never more on target.

    stay safe.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •