Tuscaloosa County Sheriff better be paying attntion too!
+1 for gun owners!!
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court held Monday that the Constitution's Second Amendment restrains government's ability to significantly limit "the right to keep and bear arms," advancing a recent trend by the John Roberts-led bench to embrace gun rights...
Tuscaloosa County Sheriff better be paying attntion too!
Praise the Lord,
Let Justice prevail !!!
Excerpt from the fox website report..."When the “Heller” decision was handed down in 2008 striking down Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and gunlock regulations, Chicago's Mayor Richard Daley predicted disaster. He said that overturning the gun ban was "a very frightening decision" and predicted more deaths along with Wild West-style shootouts and that people "are going to take a gun and they are going to end their lives in a family dispute." Washington’s Mayor Adrian Fenty similarly warned: "More handguns in the District of Columbia will only lead to more handgun violence."
This is what we have in offices throughout the country!! People who do not pay attention. Is Daley not watching the news or paying attention to his LEO? My gosh, isn't this already going on(wild west shootings/guns being used in domestic disputes)? The law abiding citizen does not take part in this unless it is to protect his/her butt, this is going on all over the country. These thugs in office need to let us take care of our own security/personal protection from all of these "wild west shootouts" Sheesh, more people take their own lives and others in car wrecks.
Its time to get these people with blinders on out of office and educate the ones who show a little hope!
2A Incorporation!!! This is the Holy Grail of gun rights! Even after Heller, I didn't think I'd see it nearly this soon.
I declare June 28th to be Incorporation Day. How fitting that it comes so close to Independence Day.
-1 for State Sovereignty. Please note that BOR was never meant to apply to the State's...only the Federal Government.
Of course, the 2A applies to the federal government just as the state constitutions apply only to the various states. But, many politicians don't care about either one. Mayor Daly is one such politician who cares about his own power, not that off the people. Chicago runs that state, regardless of what people in the rest of the state want. The states when then they joined the Union vowed to uphold the US Constitution as the law of the land. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't have rights as an American, simply as an Alabamian or whatever your state was. The Heller and Chicago decisions are a +1 for the constitutional rights at any level. They are a +1 on the federal level because the Court has twice (Heller and McDonald) affirmed an individual RKBA. They are a +1 for states rights because they ruled states can still make their own laws pertaining to guns, they just can't ban the RKBA. But, mainly they are a +1 on the individual level RKBA as opposed to the gun-grabbers suppostion that it only supports the rights of states to arm militias.
One of the great things about our Federal system of government is that if you don't like a gun ban in DC or Chicago, then you can "vote with you feet" and move to Alabama, Texas, Arizona, etc. When all mandates come from the Federal Government, where can we go? Leave the Country? Not likely...we become slaves.
Not trying to be contentious or start a debate. Just Sayin'.
Last edited by Monkeytown; 06-28-2010 at 03:37 PM.
Remember, this does not give any additional power to the Federal government; it merely extends the power of the Constitution to the States. The Federal government then has the responsibility to enforce it against the States as against itself.
Frankly, I don't think for a moment that incorporation of the BOR agains the states is a sign the federal government is "taking over". If they are taking over, it is because the states, and most particularly the voters are not doing thier job. As well, there is quite a bit of reference in the writings of the founders that lead one to believe that the idea of the BOR being the law of land, and holdable against the sates was the state of things.
As to "votin with your feet"; many can't. Are you suggesting that Mr McDonald should have taken his family and left his home? What of his family that may not have been able to move? And how many times have you left a city or state because you felt your rights were being abused by the powers that be.
As you say, not trying to be contentious or argumentative, but the reality is the legal landscape defining the relationship between the states and the federal government was fundamentally altered as a result of the issue of slavery, how it infringed on the privledges and immunities of citizenship, not to mention the aftermath of the war. If you haven't yet, read the opinions, there is a great deal of this very history spoken to there. Oh yes, and don't forget, there were a good number of laws that forbade whites from speaking freely against slavery as well, so it has not just been the issue of right to arms the states violated or continue to attempt to violate.
Is the federal government too big for it's britches? You betcha! But in any reasonable sense of what government is, one purpose must be to uphold and protect the rights and freedom of the citizens. It is exactly that the incorporation of the 2nd against state and local governments today does. I wonder how many gun owners in other nations wish they had a government so protective of their rights....
The reason we are in this mess to begin with is that preceding generations didn't fight for their rights. As someone who definitely believes in states rights, as well as constitutional limits placed on any government, I wish things were ideal, but they aren't. We can belly-ache about what is not right and "wish" it was better or we can do something about it. So, ladies and gents, what's it gonna be?
Also, if the idea of incorporation is so obvious, as many here and on other forums have stated, then why did it take 223 years for it to be deemed so?
I absolutely expected that Mr. McDonald should move if he doesn't like the law in Chicago. Or better yet, start a politcal movement to get the law changed. Do you not see the significance here. Before this ruling each State, Municipality, etc. had control of their laws regarding guns, ownership, etc. With this decision the Federal government has in essence said, decisions regarding this matter should be left to the Fed. Govt. What happens in 10-20 years when another case reachs SCOTUS and they decide differently regarding the 2nd. Guess what....the guns are bye, bye. It's amazing that those who espouse to be conservatives and constitutionalist have come down on the wrong side of this thing because their foresight is so short.
Again, this is not a personal attack on anyone. I just feel very strongly about this issue. And please do not misunderstand me, I am as Pro-2A as anyone. This is just not the right way to go about preserving the right.
Last edited by Monkeytown; 06-29-2010 at 10:29 AM.
I agree with you, MT, but up to a point. As we all know, the gun issue should be a foregone conclusion just reading the US and Alabama constitutions. But, that isn't the case. If the was no pro-gun stance in either of these documents, firearms ownership would have been outlawed by the anti-gunners decades ago. Some of the founders saw no need to put in a Bill of Rights since the Constitution didn't explicitly give the government powers against the freedoms mentioned in the BOR. We now know that government will grow well beyond its constitutional limits and therefore it will restrict limits on personal and group freedoms with or without a Bill of Rights.
We see through the hindsight of history that Jefferson(?) was right and the "price of liberty is eternal vigilance". The court decision may have helped defeat an increase in gun laws, but it is short-lived if we don't do our job. If we would have maintained our vigilance instead of getting complacent, the SC would have never had to get involved in the first place. To keep government out of our lives, we need to keep them at bay by being dedicated to fight for our rights and never stop. We need not only to fight for gun rights, but we also need to shrink the size and growth of federal and state government so they can't even go after our rights anymore.