ODA 226
Regular Member
First, I don't drink. Second, I very much agree that nobody wants to be the test case here.
Having said that, maybe the letter of the law is conflicting.
"who carries a concealed handgun onto the premises"
This could just have easily been worded:
"who, while carrying a concealed handgun upon the premises"
That changes the meaning drastically, and if that were the law, would bring it more in line with what you are trying to say. But it isn't written that way.
Sadly, only because I don't like judges writing laws, I am afraid that it is going to come to that one day, a judge finishing the job that the legislature didn't.
TFred
TFred,
I know you don't carry and drink. Neither do I. I was addressing jofrdo's comment about you being a test case. Sorry for the confusion!
Last edited: