As a printer and a graphic designer, I hold the 1A especially dear. Freedom of speech, expression, and the press are my "bread and butter" professionally. So any time someone seeks to abridge another's freedom of expression, I see it as "unreasonable restriction"...
I find it troubling that many 2A activists seem to often disregard the FUNDAMENTAL right of Free Speech (which included ALL forms of expression) enumerated by the 1A. The Bill of Rights is NOT a "Chinese Menu" where you can take one from column A and one from column B and disregard the rest because you don't like them.
If some doofus wants to wear a CC badge, then that is their RIGHT. It is a mode of expression, and there is no law prohibiting it. It's no different than wearing a "guns save lives" t-shirt, or a hat with your favorite gun-industry logo on it. It is a method of EXPRESSION, and they are expressing their (misplaced) pride in the fact that they have a permit.
Personally, I think that wearing such a badge is stupid. It defeats the purpose of CC if they are CCing. And it is absolutely unnecessary if they are OCing. It makes them look like a mall ninja to those of us "in the know" and it projects a false image of authority to the more clueless members of our society that think you need a permit to OC.
I think that wearing or even carrying such badges is silly. I think it is potentially dangerous (getting arrested for "impersonating an officer"). And I think it defeats the entire political purpose behind OC--which is to educate the public that OC is a RIGHT that requires no special badge, permission slip, or blessing from "the man".
But as a mode of expression, I will defend it. Much like burning the flag, I don't, accept or promote it, but I defend their right to express their (misguided) beliefs. Personally, I think such badges are sort of like a "warning system" to alert all knowledgeable gun owners that the wearer of such a badge is a goob with low-self esteem, and is a sad, sad example of a mall ninja and should probably be avoided at all cost.
I don't mean nothing by that. I'm just sayin'...
Sure these guys are doofuses. And you'd better believe that I WILL let them know how I feel about their little badges if I ever see anyone wearing one (hey, I can exercise my 1A rights too!). But the way I read the 1A, it does not exempt stupid, self-serving, ego-inflating expression (which is what such badges represent). Much like the 2A does not exempt "the wrong kinds of people", neither does the 1A exempt expression that is stupid, silly, or offensive to some small group.
The Bill of Rights isn't "multiple choice". You either buy into the whole thing, or you reject everything it stands for--there is no middle ground when it comes to FUNDAMENTAL human rights.
And we all have OUR 1A rights to express to these people how WE feel about their silly little badges, and we should not hesitate to exercise that right as well...