Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: NRA takes on Chicago's new gun ordinance

  1. #1
    Regular Member Gundude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sandy Eggo County
    Posts
    1,691

    NRA takes on Chicago's new gun ordinance

    A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.

  2. #2
    Newbie cato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    2,335
    Round and Round we go. Chicago must think this is fun. Oh well it's their money and our lives; nothing they care too much about.

  3. #3
    Regular Member coolusername2007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Temecula, California, USA
    Posts
    1,660
    SCOTUS had to know this would happen. This is what you get with "reasonable regulation" language when dealing with unreasonable, anti-American, anti-Constitutional, government of men, marxist socialist idealogues. Welcome to SCOTUS' new fiefdom.

  4. #4
    Regular Member Gundude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sandy Eggo County
    Posts
    1,691
    reasonable

    rea·son·a·ble [ rz'nəb'l ]

    adjective

    Definition:

    1. rational: sensible and capable of making rational judgments
    He did what any reasonable person would have done in that situation.

    2. in accord with common sense: acceptable and according to common sense or normal practice
    hoping to arrive at a reasonable time

    3. not expecting more than is possible: not expecting or demanding more than is possible or achievable
    Come on, be reasonable!

    4. not exorbitant: fairly priced and not too expensive
    Three bottles for $12 is very reasonable.

    5. fairly good: fairly good but not excellent
    The food was reasonable.

    6. fairly large: large enough but not excessive
    He earns a reasonable amount of money.

    7. (Daley) How about I shove some "resonable" up your butt.
    A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,510
    The subject title is misleading. It's not the NRA that's taking on Chicago in this case. They're not involved in it, just as they weren't involved in McDonald and actively fought against Heller. The case is Benson, et al., v. Chicago. Neither the NRA nor any of their affiliates are a party.

    The NRA-ILA page says the NRA is "supporting" this lawsuit. That could mean lots of things, from posting a positive message about the case, up to offering financial and legal support. My money would be on the former more than the latter, though.

  6. #6
    Regular Member Gundude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sandy Eggo County
    Posts
    1,691
    Quote Originally Posted by KBCraig View Post
    The subject title is misleading. It's not the NRA that's taking on Chicago in this case. They're not involved in it, just as they weren't involved in McDonald and actively fought against Heller. The case is Benson, et al., v. Chicago. Neither the NRA nor any of their affiliates are a party.

    The NRA-ILA page says the NRA is "supporting" this lawsuit. That could mean lots of things, from posting a positive message about the case, up to offering financial and legal support. My money would be on the former more than the latter, though.
    My money would be on....Legal advice.
    A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Tahoe, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    109
    Reminds me of the game "Whack-a-mole". Everytime you think you have one nailed, another one (or two) pops it ugly head.

  8. #8
    Regular Member PincheOgro1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Perris, Ca., California, USA
    Posts
    420
    Liberals never stop with their leftist progression. They will try to force their beliefs on us till the end. You notice how "they" are saying that the Supreme Court is MISREADING the Amendment? The Supreme Court ? Misreading the law ? What a bunch of idiots. They will never stop though. This is an unending battle against leftist oppression. Even England is looking at their gun ban laws and thinking about repealing them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •