• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Who said that the McDonald Case would have not effects?

Edward Peruta

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
1,247
Location
Connecticut USA
Who said that the McDonald Decision would not have any effect.

The Maloney decision was vacated and remanded because of McDonald.

Supreme Court of the United States


MALONEY, JAMES M. V. RICE, KATHLEEN A.


No. 08-1592.



June 29, 2010.


*1 The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. ___ (2010). Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

U.S.,2010.
Maloney v. Rice
 

CNReporter

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
22
Location
Redondo Beach
CASE NO 09-CV-2371-IEG (BLM) EDWARD PERUTA vs COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and WILLIAM D. GORE

Who said that the McDonald Decision would not have any effect.

Speaking of which, how is your San Diego lawsuit going? Do you have an ETA or best guess as to when you will have an initial judgement?
 
Top