• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Concealed carry debate continues at state level - River Falls Journal

BerettaFS92Custom

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
232
Location
mid south but not madison , , USA
Beat Down

i really thought that the beating that tom barrett took at state fair awhile back would have changed his attitude about the right we all deserve to defend ourselves. but you cant fix stupid...

Actually it has changed his way of thinking. he now rides in an armored car, has 50 bodyguards armed with SAW weapons and that is good for him. For us lowly peons.. well you get the picture We do not deserve to have preservation of life only the elite are allowed such an item....
 

paul@paul-fisher.com

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
4,049
Location
Chandler, AZ
Only a pea-brain would compare the needs of legitimate organizations receiving voluntary contributions with burdensome taxation and permit/license fees.

I believe 'pea brain' :banghead: was implying that if there is mandatory training, some states use phrases such as 'NRA approved training' so these 'volunteer' groups benefit by not having Constitutional Carry.

I believe Doug is many things, I believe his brain is not the size of a pea.
 

Nutczak

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
2,165
Location
The Northwoods, lakeland area, Wisconsin, USA
Under the first Amendment, you have the right to free speech, you do not need a permit for that no matter how idiotic you speech is. Under the fourth amendment, you do not have to get a permit to be secure in your persons, houses, papers or effects. Under the thirteenth amendment you do not have to get a permit that absolves you from being a slave or involuntarily servitude if you have not been convicted of a crime. Can someone please explain to me why I should have to pay a fee to exercise my second amendment to carry as how I see fit for the situation?

Thank you Chauktaw!

That was my argument and point too.
You people that are willing to settle for a permitting system seem to forget that the right to keep and bear arms is deeply rooted in the foundation of this once great nation.
Permits to gain permission to exercise a right? :They can all bit my shiny metal ass" (Bender, circa 2002)
 

Spartacus

Banned
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
1,185
Location
La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
I believe 'pea brain' :banghead: was implying that if there is mandatory training, some states use phrases such as 'NRA approved training' so these 'volunteer' groups benefit by not having Constitutional Carry.

I believe Doug is many things, I believe his brain is not the size of a pea.

I concur, although I doubt it is any larger than a walnut. His affectation of cloaking simple language in a mist of archaic speech in a futile attempt to cover a wider range of meaning is annoying to say the least.

I see your point Paul, but since we have about a one percent chance of getting constitutional carry at least at first, we may have to live and work with these organizations.

Gleason, you are a fly on my ass. Shoo!
 

hardballer

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
925
Location
West Coast of Wisconsin
I would prefer the option of open or concealed as personal preference. I can not conceal my OC firearm very easily and I don't want to be forced to to carry a smaller caliber concealed weapon so I don't print. If I OC somewhere and decide that I would prefer to tuck the gun in an inside pocket for some reason, I want to be able to do that. We need to have the choice to carry either way at any time and to switch back and forth as we see fit given our own particular circumstances, really no matter where we are. The regulations we try to sort through right now are mind boggling, we don't need more rules.
Exactly why we need Constitutional Carry. No added bureaucracy. No permits. No licenses. The Constitution is the law. The statutes are breaking the law.

I believe 'pea brain' :banghead: was implying that if there is mandatory training, some states use phrases such as 'NRA approved training' so these 'volunteer' groups benefit by not having Constitutional Carry.
I believe that the NRA is collapsing under the weight of it's own self importance. They are now far more interested in making deals that benifit the NRA at the expense of 'the people'. They don't get my $$$ any longer.
I believe Doug is many things, I believe his brain is not the size of a pea.

I agree that Doug may have a brain larger than a pea. I further posit he may actually be of value as a fellow supporter of the Constitution and Open Carry. It is not constructive to disparage a member of this group in public. I appreciate hearing anything a fellow member has to say but would appreciate disparaging comments be kept to a 'private message' thank you. I don't mind the heat of criticism. I just may not always agree.

Under the first Amendment, you have the right to free speech, you do not need a permit for that no matter how idiotic you speech is. Under the fourth amendment, you do not have to get a permit to be secure in your persons, houses, papers or effects. Under the thirteenth amendment you do not have to get a permit that absolves you from being a slave or involuntarily servitude if you have not been convicted of a crime. Can someone please explain to me why I should have to pay a fee to exercise my second amendment to carry as how I see fit for the situation?
+1000000 There is no question that Constitutional Carry is legal, The statutes preventing us from such, are in violation of the Constitution. I am not sure how that is squared but I believe it is because we have simply allowed it. We, all of us have allowed these illegal statutes to stand because we just did not participate. Didn't think it was important. Didn't want it to interfere with acquiring my SUV or whatever toy was more important at the time that took your eyes off the Constitution and our freedom and liberty.

Fartacus there is a funny thing about that black spec on the top of bird 5hit. It is still bird5hit and your the black spec.
J., I know Spartacus and would; without hesitation, stand with him just as I would with you. Let's get this solidarity thing figured out. A united front will win this battle and the others yet to come. I have an idea, let us all direct this passion; like a laser beam, at the protagonist in this drama. The curtain has not yet fallen and our goals not yet reached. We've a lot of work to do and precious little energy to do it with.
 

J.Gleason

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
3,481
Location
Chilton, Wisconsin, USA
J., I know Spartacus and would; without hesitation, stand with him just as I would with you. Let's get this solidarity thing figured out. A united front will win this battle and the others yet to come. I have an idea, let us all direct this passion; like a laser beam, at the protagonist in this drama. The curtain has not yet fallen and our goals not yet reached. We've a lot of work to do and precious little energy to do it with.[/QUOTE]


Hey I have tried, his constant insults and dissenting remarks toward everything I say and certain members here say deserve a response now and then. Just because you help with a picnic doesn't make you an all knowing elitist. His constant bashing on what others have done to help is only a testament to his one sided way of thinking that only the efforts he puts forward are the ones worth recognizing. He deserves what he gets when he acts that way. I guess being in the presence of other elitists gave him a big head.

Even when I leave it alone he comes back for more with another member.
 
M

McX

Guest
i'm an elitist. were all elitists here. we take on the social responsibility of being armed, knowing the laws to the letter, obeying the laws, being good citizens, helping, supporting, and advising each other. we all stand tall, alot taller than most!
 

jpm84092

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
1,066
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Civil Rights

I compare the right to open carry and the right to concealed carry to the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s. The Constitution, particularly after the 14th Amendment, made it clear that Black people could vote and own firearms, but yet there was Selma Alabama and places like it - and who could forget those folks wearing those sheets. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. made eloquent speeches, but a modicum of equality under the law for blacks took decades.

The Nine Wise Ones (at least 5 of them) have affirmed the right to own firearms, for the lawful purpose of protecting one's person, family, and dwelling, is a Civil Right. SCOTUS, in Heller v DC and McDonald v Chicago, did not mention carry methods, but I am sure there will be a case soon. Fortunately, none of the 4 conservatives or Justice Kennedy appear to be retiring anytime soon. For historical perspective, Dr. King's speeches were ignored by many in this country, but the perseverance of both Blacks and Whites insured continued progress toward the goal of true equality under the law. This process had some elements in the Congress (Civil Rights Act) and the Courts, but it was the perseverance of many who made the difference. My former neighbors, you will get much further taking baby steps toward full equality (Constitutional Carry) than simply demanding it outright and expecting it to happen. Go ahead and demand full accountability, but do not fight battles that you will lose and in doing so set the cause back. Persevere, and win the hearts and minds of the anti-gun nuts.

Teach your neighbors the truth about what happens in CCW States. There are no Wild West Shootouts among neighbors. Indeed, an armed society is a polite society. Most people in Utah are very polite, and it is not because they are Mormon.

Teach them that when seconds count, the Police are minutes away. Teach them that restrictive gun laws do not stop criminals; indeed the opposite happens. Teach them that CCW permit holders become super law abiding citizens (that is actually what happens here - you can tell the permit holders, they screw up traffic on the freeway by going the speed limit).

While I live in Utah now, I grew up in Janesville, Wisconsin. I am delighted with the progress to date in WI. When I was younger, open carry was technically legal, but anyone who complained or was frightened resulted in the person carrying being cited for misdemeanor disorderly conduct. Today, the trend is different and that is progress.

I wish to remind my former neighbors that while AK, VT, and AZ may have Constitutional Carry, AK and AZ offer permits anyway. This is so that their citizens can protect their families and themselves when traveling outside their State. My former neighbors, you are actually in much better shape than many in the USA. New York and New Jersey issue CCW permits, but they are "may issue" States and getting one is nearly impossible. Same with Kommiefornia. And, NY and NJ are not open carry tolerant.

Encourage your State legislators to pass concealed carry. Discourage them from very stringent requirements and especially from having reciprocity with "resident only" permits. This will only draw retaliation from States that do not restrict non-resident permits or who themselves issue non-resident permits. Remind them that you will not be appreciative of any restriction that draws the ire of other States and in doing so affects your ability to protect yourself, your family, and your property while traveling. Once Wisconsin has a CCW permit, you still may need out-of-state non-resident permits to be free to travel most of the country while exercising your Civil Right to protect yourself, your family, and your possessions.

Then, get the Wisconsin Legislature to pass a "Castle Doctrine" policy. This will make it very clear to potential felons that if they are injured while attempting to murder you, your spouse, and your children, they have no civil tort recourse.

I have heard it said that open carry is more of a deterrent to bad guys than concealed carry. I am not going to attack that belief, but my experience here in a strong concealed carry State differs. Here in Utah, the bad guys think twice, then again, and then again, before attacking anyone who is not obviously terrified. That can get you dead out here in the West.

I wish you all the best of luck. If Wisconsin gets a Concealed Carry law and that law allows non-resident permits, I will fly back and be first in line to get one. Then, I will put it into my wallet next to my Utah, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Florida permits.

Jim
 
Top