If he chooses to post again without the insults, I'll respond. I've learned over the years that there is no value in posting to people who disagree by insulting the person they disagree with.
Like I said, if he posts again without the insult, I'll be happy to respond.
oh, ok. Then here ya go...
Originally Posted by eye95
I never said it would have legal standing. That is a standard that you are applying. I won't speak for how it works in Nevada, but it could be similar to how it works in Alabama. After the security indicates that you are not welcome with your gun, they may not force you to leave. They will call the police. (Gee, that's what happened here.) The police will ask you to leave. If you don't, they then have evidence of trespass and will arrest you. That is not to say that you were not trespassing BEFORE the police arrived, they just will not bother to do anything about it if you leave.
Originally Posted by wrightme
If it has no legal standing, it is not relevant. And guess what? This shooting took place in Nevada, not in Alabama. If you really want to discuss it and not simply be an LE apologist, find out how it works IN NEVADA before discussing what happened IN NEVADA.
Originally Posted by wrightme
The ONLY legal standing begins with "trespass." In Nevada, a mere sign indicating "no firearms allowed" might as well not be posted. An employee telling you that "we don't allow guns in here" might as well keep his opinion to himself. It isn't grounds for shooting by LE!
Originally Posted by eye95
Now, when the police arrive, they will be leary of the MWAG who would not leave. They will be on high alert if they were advised that he was acting erratically. Not following their instructions, reaching for the place where you've been told the gun was, pulling something out, and pointing it at the officers will, expectedly, get you shot.
Originally Posted by wrightme
In Nevada, unless an agent of the property owner 'trespasses' a person, there is no "MWAG who would not leave." If you cannot (or will not) understand this, you are discussing something of which you are completely ignorant.
Originally Posted by wrightme
Being in CostCo with a firearm was not a crime. Remaining in CostCo after an employee supposedly informed him that "we do not allow firearms in here" was not a crime. The person who called 911 failed. Dispatch failed. CostCo failed. Responding LE failed. Citizen died. You showed up as an LE apologist.