Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Judge rips sheriff for rejecting gun permit. Great article!

  1. #1
    Campaign Veteran rcawdor57's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Wisconsin, USA

    Wink Judge rips sheriff for rejecting gun permit. Great article!

    We need more judges like this one!

  2. #2
    Regular Member simmonsjoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Mattaponi, Virginia, United States

    Court mandated and approved course on the Constitution.


  3. #3
    Regular Member johnny amish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    High altitude of Vernon County, ,
    We need more judges that believe the constitution is in place for our protection

  4. #4
    Regular Member Dreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Columbia, in the Peoples Republic of Murderland
    What is wrong with that judge? What a nutcase...

    He's obviously just a conspiracy-theorist "cop-basher". How dare he condemn criminal activities of a sworn officer. And who does he think he is accepting evidence in his court that proves collusion with other officers and administrators? Doesn't he know that if you point such actions out, or attempt to hold them responsible, that's just "cop bashing"? The only reason ANYONE would ever point out such things is because they have some sort of vendetta against law enforcement.

    And what's with this wacky First Amendment activism from the bench? Everyone knows that "free speech" doesn't apply to unpopular ideas, or speech that makes people uncomfortable, or is contrary to the general consensus.

    Good thing this Judge isn't on an Internet forum. He's have his court "locked" after a ruling like this...

    <burning sarcasm OFF>
    It is our cause to dispel the foggy thinking which avoids hard decisions in the delusion that a world of conflict will somehow mysteriously resolve itself into a world of harmony, if we just don't rock the boat or irritate the forces of aggression—and this is hogwash."
    --Barry Goldwater, 1964

  5. #5
    Founder's Club Member ixtow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Suwannee County, FL
    Sarcasm aside, it is actually very 'weird' for a Judge to uphold this. They're usually every bit in collusion with the LEOs they drink with. I have a feeling he may not be a Judge for long. Going along with the Us vs Them mentality of the LEO gangs is usually required if you want to live. They have lots of guns and other stuff they aren't supposed to have...

    Of course, telling it like it is makes me a cop basher, too...

  6. #6
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    I love it! "Your sentence, Sherrif, is to study!

    Last edited by since9; 07-24-2010 at 11:44 PM.
    The 1st protects the 2nd, and the 2nd protects the 1st. GET THIS OR LOSE IT ALLl: 27-2=0. Our 2A is THE bellwether, and ain't none finer: Islamic Reality. Our Founding Fathers on Church and State. PC=ZERO.

  7. #7
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    N. Chesterfield, Va.
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    I love it! "Your sentence, Sherrif, is to study!

    Will there be pop quizes and a "final exam" ?

    Even better would have been for the judge to require that he report back with a satisfactory grade.
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Alabama, ,
    Good timing for a test, as the FBI hands out the answers before hand, and states cannot have less of a standard than the big boys.

    No wonder they can't connect the dots, they got the wrong cheat-sheet memo.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    ""The court finds a tsunami, a maelstrom, an avalanche, of direct uncontroverted evidence in Sheriff Weber's own testimony to conclude beyond all doubt that he unquestionably violated the First Amendment rights of ... Paul Dorr," Bennett wrote in the decision."

    Ha hahahahaha ha ha haha hahahaaaa!

    "U.S. District Judge Mark Bennett also ordered Weber to successfully complete a court-approved course on the U.S. Constitution within five months."

    double Ha hahahahaha ha ha haha hahahaaaa!

    (quoted from the article linked above... credit where due... don't want any Copyright issues)

  10. #10
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    The Real World.
    While I agree with the ruling, and Mr Dorr's anti-abortion stance, I have to wonder if there are liability issues here.If the person having issuing authority suspects a person is mentally unstable through actual interaction with them, wouldn't it be acceptible if a permit was denied? At least until an impartial body examined the applicant, or as in this case a judge made the decision. If the sheriff had hacked off on the paperwork and issued a permit, and Mr Dorr eventually commited murder against an abortionist, would the sheriff be at fault? If it happens now will the judge be liable? In our society now over run with unscrupulous litigators, I just have to wonder who's liable legally now that it seems like everyone but an offender is blamed for his own actions.

    I'm glad Mr Dorr got his permit, however I still don't believe he should have to get one in the first place. We either have a right, or a priviledge. The abortionists in Iowa might want to start exersizing their priviledge, just in case.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts