If memory serves, we have a kind of 50/50 castle doctrine.
Basically, you can shoot them if and only if they are in the process of breaking into your place of residence. It's this line thats the kicker:
You can shoot them if you've been woken up to someone breaking glass, grab your gun and find someone climbing through the window or trying to get the lock to turn. Once they are inside though, then you can't use deadly force.against an intruder to prevent a forcible entry into the home or residence or to terminate the intruder's unlawful entry
Of course, if you fear for your life once they gain entry, then you can shoot at them in self defense (you see something in their hand, they charged at you)
We do not have a duty to retreat while in the home, so you don't have to go to a corner and see if the BG comes at you before you shoot at them.A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence does not have a duty to retreat from an intruder in the circumstances described in this section.
This part is making me think. I'm fairly certain we can use any force necessary, except deadly force, to keep people from taking our stuff. But this clause basically says that if they are going to take your TV (felony theft because it is valued at more then $50), then you can shoot them. But since they aren't posing a threat to you, you can't shoot them. Anyone want to help?if the occupant reasonably believes that the intruder intends to commit a felony in the home or residence.