Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Handgun registration

  1. #1
    Regular Member Gundude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Sandy Eggo County

    Handgun registration

    I have been looking for information on the benifits of handgun registration. I can't find any. Is there a valid reason for for requiring registration. The main reasons I hear are:
    It helps police identify who owns a handgun used in a crime, but how many handguns are used in a crime by the registered owner. I suspect most are stolen.
    In Chicago, they say first responders need to know if there is a handgun at the place of the call. Will the fireman need to search your house and account for all handguns before they put out the fire? How many fireman have been shot responding to a fire call?
    One reason I heard in Clark County, NV. They can return a handgun used in a crime to the rightful owner. When asked how many had been returned, they didn't have that information.
    Can anyone give me a good reason?
    A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The rights existence is all the reason he needs.

  2. #2
    Activist Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Reno, Nevada, USA
    If you banned firearms a lot of people would hide them and never claim to have had any.

    If you require registration and told people guns would never be banned, most will register rather than become criminals, and then later when and if you ban guns it makes them a lot easier to round up.

    Or you could control them in other ways like Chicago did. They required registration, and then they made it illegal to transfer a registered handgun to anyone else and illegal to register new ones. Basically, it was a ban that resulted in handguns totally banned as soon as all the owners died. Or if registration is free now they can impose fees later on to generate revenue.

    Kind of like how they put red light cameras up in states other then California even though no bill has passed authorizing their use in such states. They sit ready, just waiting for the legislation to pass to make them useful.

    Of course, now that Heller has made Chicago's ban void, handgun registration is a lot less useful, but even if they can't ban them outright they can use the registration to make sales more difficult and apply other restrictions to guns. The name of the game is to make gun ownership and use as hard as possible. The Feds still maintain a ban on all machine guns made after 1986. They simply required registration and made it illegal to register any more.

    Didn't California already use "assault weapon" registration to confiscate certain "assault weapons"?

    As for actual benefits for society, just like for all gun control, there aren't any actual benefits... unless if making anti-gun people irrationally feel cozy is a benefit.
    Last edited by Felid`Maximus; 08-07-2010 at 02:11 PM.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    , ,

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts