• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Handgun registration

Gundude

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
1,691
Location
Sandy Eggo County
I have been looking for information on the benifits of handgun registration. I can't find any. Is there a valid reason for for requiring registration. The main reasons I hear are:
It helps police identify who owns a handgun used in a crime, but how many handguns are used in a crime by the registered owner. I suspect most are stolen.
In Chicago, they say first responders need to know if there is a handgun at the place of the call. Will the fireman need to search your house and account for all handguns before they put out the fire? How many fireman have been shot responding to a fire call?
One reason I heard in Clark County, NV. They can return a handgun used in a crime to the rightful owner. When asked how many had been returned, they didn't have that information.
Can anyone give me a good reason? :confused:
 

Felid`Maximus

Activist Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
1,714
Location
Reno, Nevada, USA
If you banned firearms a lot of people would hide them and never claim to have had any.

If you require registration and told people guns would never be banned, most will register rather than become criminals, and then later when and if you ban guns it makes them a lot easier to round up.

Or you could control them in other ways like Chicago did. They required registration, and then they made it illegal to transfer a registered handgun to anyone else and illegal to register new ones. Basically, it was a ban that resulted in handguns totally banned as soon as all the owners died. Or if registration is free now they can impose fees later on to generate revenue.

Kind of like how they put red light cameras up in states other then California even though no bill has passed authorizing their use in such states. They sit ready, just waiting for the legislation to pass to make them useful.

Of course, now that Heller has made Chicago's ban void, handgun registration is a lot less useful, but even if they can't ban them outright they can use the registration to make sales more difficult and apply other restrictions to guns. The name of the game is to make gun ownership and use as hard as possible. The Feds still maintain a ban on all machine guns made after 1986. They simply required registration and made it illegal to register any more.

Didn't California already use "assault weapon" registration to confiscate certain "assault weapons"?

As for actual benefits for society, just like for all gun control, there aren't any actual benefits... unless if making anti-gun people irrationally feel cozy is a benefit.
 
Last edited:
Top