jt59
Regular Member
I am sure this has been done, but I was ranging around on the forum and came across this discussion.
It lead me to here: http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states/washington.html
I thought I read somewhere here, that a LEO on duty as a public servent was in the public venue and therefore notification that you were recording the conversation or video-ing was "assumed" when making contact.
This reference to the rules of engagement don't seem to say that.
Clarification/Comment please?
Also, there was a link to a pretty good set of recorders and subtle video (in a ball cap?) referenced too....could someone please bump that for me?
It lead me to here: http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states/washington.html
I thought I read somewhere here, that a LEO on duty as a public servent was in the public venue and therefore notification that you were recording the conversation or video-ing was "assumed" when making contact.
This reference to the rules of engagement don't seem to say that.
Clarification/Comment please?
Also, there was a link to a pretty good set of recorders and subtle video (in a ball cap?) referenced too....could someone please bump that for me?