B
Bikenut
Guest
Possible angle for letter to AG's office concerning all the efforts being expended by citizens all over the State due to illegal ordinances... and the reluctance of some municipalities to change them.
I have a letter in the construction stages in my mind that is based on the concept of "undue burden". It seems to me that it is an "undue burden" upon the citizens of this State to need to contact municipalities with illegal ordinances... then need to convince said municipalities of their obligation to stay within the confines of MCL 123.1102 (otherwise known as the preemption law) which can take many months with many hours and much personal resources expended by the average citizen.
Would it not be the AG's office obligation to step in and relieve this "undue burden" upon the citizens by ... oh.. I don't exactly know... releasing a statement or contacting all municipalities to check their ordinances for compliance... or ??????
My questions ... up for peer review... is simple.
Does the AG's office have this responsibility? Could the AG's office legally do such a thing? And... then there is this... would the AG's office actually get involved because of the "undue burden" concept?
Or am I just complaining about going broke because of attending, and getting tired of sitting through, eye bleedingly boring council meetings all over my area of the State?
I have a letter in the construction stages in my mind that is based on the concept of "undue burden". It seems to me that it is an "undue burden" upon the citizens of this State to need to contact municipalities with illegal ordinances... then need to convince said municipalities of their obligation to stay within the confines of MCL 123.1102 (otherwise known as the preemption law) which can take many months with many hours and much personal resources expended by the average citizen.
Would it not be the AG's office obligation to step in and relieve this "undue burden" upon the citizens by ... oh.. I don't exactly know... releasing a statement or contacting all municipalities to check their ordinances for compliance... or ??????
My questions ... up for peer review... is simple.
Does the AG's office have this responsibility? Could the AG's office legally do such a thing? And... then there is this... would the AG's office actually get involved because of the "undue burden" concept?
Or am I just complaining about going broke because of attending, and getting tired of sitting through, eye bleedingly boring council meetings all over my area of the State?