Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: An Anti-OC Article that needs a serious fisking

  1. #1
    Regular Member 230therapy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    People's County of Fairfax
    Posts
    276

    An Anti-OC Article that needs a serious fisking

    http://thetruthaboutguns.com/2010/08...ut-open-carry/

    Everyone,

    This article needs some serious debunking. Let's hammer the comments section with sound arguments!
    Does anyone here actually believe that the Founders were sitting around in John Adams' tavern UNARMED because they believed a bar should be a gun free zone?

  2. #2
    Regular Member MamaLiberty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newcastle, Wyoming, USA
    Posts
    885
    Eye said it best. If the guy comes here to debate us, fine. Otherwise, why boost his hit count there? Nuts to him.
    I will not knowingly initiate force. I am a self owner.

    Let the record show that I did not consent to be governed. I did not consent to any constitution. I did not consent to any president. I did not consent to any law except the natural law of "mala en se." I did not consent to the police. Nor any tax. Nor any prohibition of anything. Nor any regulation or licensing of any kind.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    434
    I read some really well thought out comments on that page. Far as I'm concerned they've done a bang up job and I would have nothing to add.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    SW Idaho
    Posts
    1,552
    What a limp-wristed wankster. The guy doesn't even carry.

    Just goes to show you that "shooting enthusiasts" are not rights advocates, and are rarely our allies. Even the mainstream hunting magazines these days are too milquetoast for my taste when it comes to INALIENABLE RIGHTS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •