thanks doug, that made it real easy to decide who i'm voting for.
Originally Posted by Steinhorst
thanks doug, that made it real easy to decide who i'm voting for.
which branch of the SS is this chump with?
maybe he's with the luftwaffle.
Dougie your references to elected officials as Nazis is stupid at best. We vote them out if we don't agree with them but even at their worst they are hardly comparable to schutzstaffel except in your twisted consciousness.
Meister is by far the best candidate, it is not even a close call there for me, I know them both fairly well. Steinhorst is not a bad guy, his father was the Sheriff for many years, I just think he is a VERY distant second place.
We must remember that they do not decide the law, they only uphold it, or not if they are tyrannical I guess. He is saying exactly what the police associations want to hear, almost all law enforcement will say they are for licensed CCW because the numerous associations will usually make them go away or give no backing if they dont.
Sounds kinda nazi to me actually, whats a Constitution, I was just following orders type of thing. You need backing to be the head brown shirt, I mean Sheriff. People do call them brown shirts though, same with the nazi SA. Which turned into the SS and gestapo and a terrible holocaust etc etc. Cmon with the names Meister and Steinhorst and the Sheriffs dept wearing brown shirts, you just cant resist that.
But its really a non-issue, they do not decide what the law is, only enforcement of it. That is very far out there with the special tags on our plates and drivers licenses though. I do think its cool they are talking about it, because as soon as we get a republican governor I bet we will get CCW passed.
Last edited by minuteman; 08-27-2010 at 04:34 PM.
"I do believe in the Constitution," Meister said, adding that he is not opposed to allowing concealed weapons in Wisconsin if gun owners consent to a background check and psychological test at their own expense before receiving a permit."
So... I guess Meister is better because he didnt want "to be able to identify people with licenses to carry concealed weapons through information on their drivers license, license plate, or in electronic state Department of Transportation records."?
Any permit is not a good thing, we should have the right to carry concealed in my opinion, not a privilege that would require a test. It sounds like a typical statement a law enforcement association would push for, actually it almost seems to me like a money making scheme. Who would be giving the psychological tests? Dont prisoners make license plates? Funny how they both mention the costs and that the people need to pay for it.
Dougie at least come up with some original names for your sock puppets will you? And hopefully you are using proxies to register and post? Otherwise John ain't gonna like it.
With 347 posts you continue to prove you'd rather insult people than anything else, especially admit you were wrong. I didn't attack you, I pointed out that you mis-attributed McX's post/comment to Doug in your haste to continue your vendetta against him, something I think most any regular reader of the forum would probably agree is readily apparent.
As I've commented in other posts (if you'd bothered to look at any of my posts), I'm a liberal and a gun rights advocate. Truth be told, I don't agree with a lot of the specific stances a lot of people on here have about concealed carry, Doug included. And I doubt many of you, especially Doug, would agree with a lot of my thoughts on concealed carry. On the other hand, I have a feeling I could have a civil conversation with Doug about my thoughts vs. his thoughts on the issue. I don't get that impression from you. I do agree wholeheartedly, however, about open carry and about the rights we have when it comes to being stopped by the police.
If you want specifics from me to prove I'm not an alias of Doug's, email me privately and ask, because I'm not going to give out personal information in a public post. I will say that my nickname of "The Don" isn't a reference to Don Quixote, but one I've had for over 10 years...back to when I lived in your neck of the woods and worked at Channel 8. My guess is you won't bother to email me, you'll just toss another insult or two my way. Do as you will, matters not to me. I made the offer. If John (administrator?) wants that info, I'll be happy to provide that to him, too.
Speaking of giving out personal information, your obvious dislike for anything Doug posts, and things of that nature...it's fine you don't like Doug, it's fine if he doesn't like you (though I suspect he doesn't give you much thought), whatever...that's a cat-fight between the two of you, but at least have some friggin' respect. He's one of the few people on here that is apparently using his real name and not hiding behind any aliases, myself and yourself included, something I respect a lot and wish I wasn't so paranoid about doing myself. Knock it off with the childish Dougie crap, already, and at least be civil. You claim to own handguns, which means you're an adult...start acting like it.
And he represents WCI at the gun shows? yeeeesh, that really sets a lasting impression.
jeeez! did i miss something here? don't be bustin on my doug, he's ok in my book, your all ok in my book. be excellent to each other, party on....
Whatever you think of Doug, he was BANNED for using sock puppets in the past and will probably be permanently banned if caught using them again. Yes, he may use his own name for the majority of his post-whoring, but to make up Internet Friends such as Don Quixote and Sancho Panza to tag-team his BS is unconscionable and not allowed on any forum.
BTW, you still haven't admitted you mis-attributed the initial Nazi reference. It's good to see you're still insulting and belittling others, though. Full marks for consistency and predictability.
But in the event you are a unique individual then yes, you should already know that it takes a while to gain credibility on a forum. I have actually met and interacted with most of the guys that post on here and I know who they are and what they stand for. When I know you or hear from others that they have met you in person then I will take you seriously. Until then you are a phantom who lacks credibility especially if you pop up only to defend a known ID thief like Doug.
Last edited by Spartacus; 08-28-2010 at 10:24 AM.
The persons home county, and has family living there? Is it your home county? Do you have family living here? Do you even care about the actual topic? Or do you just like to "confuse the situation"?
The Don has every right to post on here, you are not better or more special because you have more posts. In fact he only clarified your confusion when suggesting Doug made the nazi comment.
And you are totally confused if you think we can just vote out someone here with bad ideas on concealed carry, they are both saying almost the exact same things, directly from the ideas of law enforcement associations across the state. The democrat running is not a good candidate at all, I dont want to even get into that because I have ill feelings towards the person.
When you get something wrong you should apologize rather than continue to put someone down for no good reason. You were wrong about the nazi comment, wrong about the person being Doug, wrong about them confusing the situation, and wrong to say they should not post in a thread like this.