eye95
Well-known member
Now, that is a distinction without a difference. Liberty does not exist in transactions that are what you see as "commercial" and not in those that are not. Neither is the converse true.
Either we have the Liberty to convince others to do something, or we have no real Liberty. By your standard, the Founders were violating the Liberty of others by convincing them that Independence was a cause they should work toward.
I am sorry, your premise is flawed in the fundamental. If you hang on to it, you, of course, can justify any argument. If you dispose of it, you will be arguing for Liberty.
If you hang on to that flawed premise, discussion with you on this topic would be a colossal waste of time.
So, I will move on. Dispose of that contradictory axiom, and we can continue discussing. Moving on for now.
Either we have the Liberty to convince others to do something, or we have no real Liberty. By your standard, the Founders were violating the Liberty of others by convincing them that Independence was a cause they should work toward.
I am sorry, your premise is flawed in the fundamental. If you hang on to it, you, of course, can justify any argument. If you dispose of it, you will be arguing for Liberty.
If you hang on to that flawed premise, discussion with you on this topic would be a colossal waste of time.
So, I will move on. Dispose of that contradictory axiom, and we can continue discussing. Moving on for now.