• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Unloaded Carry??

orqusgu

New member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
8
Location
NW
I had some questions about carrying without a CHL.

Is it okay to:

1. Carry an unloaded handgun in a holster, with a loaded magazine in your pants pocket or a magazine holster?
1a. If so, is this permissible even in the cities with regulations?

2. Carry an unloaded handgun in a backpack or coat pocket, with a loaded magazine in your pants pocket or magazine holster?

3. This relates to the questions above: if a handgun is unloaded, can it be concealed without a CHL?

4. Is it any different for a revolver? Could you open carry an empty revolver in a holster, but have bullets in your pocket?

5. Carry a loaded magazine in your pocket or in a holster, but have the unloaded handgun locked in a backpack?
5a. Carry a loaded magazine, but have the unloaded handgun locked in the glovebox of a car?

Any input would be great. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:

sultan62

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
1,311
Location
Clayton, NC
The answers to these questions will vary greatly depending on what state you are in. You would be better off asking in the state forum, or at least updating your profile to reflect your location or mentioning it here.
 

orqusgu

New member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
8
Location
NW
The answers to these questions will vary greatly depending on what state you are in. You would be better off asking in the state forum, or at least updating your profile to reflect your location or mentioning it here.

Oregon/Washington
 

1245A Defender

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
4,365
Location
north mason county, Washington, USA
some answers

I had some questions about carrying without a CHL.

Is it okay to:

1. Carry an unloaded handgun in a holster, with a loaded magazine in your pants pocket or a magazine holster?
in oregon, it is OK, unless youre in OC banned cities
1a. If so, is this permissible even in the cities with regulations?
no!

2. Carry an unloaded handgun in a backpack or coat pocket, with a loaded magazine in your pants pocket or magazine holster?
only 3 states, alaska, arizona, and vermont allow CC without a permit. any gun in a coat pocket is CC. transporting an unloaded gun in a pack pack, a fanny pack, or alock box, is almost always lawful.

3. This relates to the questions above: if a handgun is unloaded, can it be concealed without a CHL?
see above!

4. Is it any different for a revolver? Could you open carry an empty revolver in a holster, but have bullets in your pocket?
the type of concealable gun doesnt matter, bullets in your pocket is AOK. everywhere except OC banned cities.

5. Carry a loaded magazine in your pocket or in a holster, but have the unloaded handgun locked in a backpack?
call the magazine full or empty, again see banned cities.
5a. Carry a loaded magazine, but have the unloaded handgun locked in the glovebox of a car?
this is usually lawful.

go to the washington and oregon forums and down load the OC pamphlets from the stickied threads at the top, much good info to carry around share with others and study!



Any input would be great. Thanks in advance.

say hi in those forums, get to know us!
 

orqusgu

New member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
8
Location
NW
say hi in those forums, get to know us!

Thanks very much for the info!

Can you help me on 5. Are you saying you cannot carry loaded magazines in banned cities?

If I am in a banned city, but have an unloaded handgun locked in my backpack (a lock around the zippers so it is not accessible) with a magazine in my pocket, is that oaky?

Also, is this an acceptable container? http://cgi.ebay.com/SOFT-CASE-GUN-PISTOL-STORAGE-SAFETY-NCSTAR-NEW-BLACK-/120617535850
 
Last edited:

1245A Defender

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
4,365
Location
north mason county, Washington, USA
you need to start doing your own reserch

Thanks very much for the info!

Can you help me on 5. Are you saying you cannot carry loaded magazines in banned cities?

If I am in a banned city, but have an unloaded handgun locked in my backpack (a lock around the zippers so it is not accessible) with a magazine in my pocket, is that oaky?

Also, is this an acceptable container? http://cgi.ebay.com/SOFT-CASE-GUN-PISTOL-STORAGE-SAFETY-NCSTAR-NEW-BLACK-/120617535850

i think the case is fine for transport, but in portland, a banned city,
even the magazine must be empty, if you have a gun!
 

Phssthpok

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
1,026
Location
, ,
i think the case is fine for transport, but in portland, a banned city,
even the magazine must be empty, if you have a gun!

Not wanting to appear rude or condescending, but you need to go read the actual LAWS before passing out information.


See HERE for discussion.


In a nutshell:

1: The state legislature has preempted ALL firearms related law in the State and political sub-division may only pass firearms laws that they are AUTHORIZED TO by the legislature.

2: The legislature HAS authorized permission to enact laws for the restriction of carrying a LOADED firearm.

3: The legislature HAS NOT authorized permission to enact any laws for the restriction of loaded magazines (a magazine being firearm component and not a firearm in and of itself).
 

1245A Defender

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
4,365
Location
north mason county, Washington, USA
me too!!

Not wanting to appear rude or condescending, but you need to go read the actual LAWS before passing out information.


See HERE for discussion.
BTW,,i remember reading that thread,, i too thought that recklessly, was a strange word in the law, and liked the poster that said he didnt recklessly fail to remove the ammo,,, he intentionally
fail to remove the ammo!


In a nutshell:

1: The state legislature has preempted ALL firearms related law in the State and political sub-division may only pass firearms laws that they are AUTHORIZED TO by the legislature.

2: The legislature HAS authorized permission to enact laws for the restriction of carrying a LOADED firearm.

3: The legislature HAS NOT authorized permission to enact any laws for the restriction of loaded magazines (a magazine being firearm component and not a firearm in and of itself).

from the oregon tri-fold, its in the stickies.
city of portland 14.A.60.010 (B)
it is unlawful to carry a fire arm and its magazine in a public place,
recklessly having failed to remove the ammo from the magazine! (paraphrased)

i see now that your real argument with me here, is really about your feeling about the validity of the law itself.
I agree with you,, preemption should be complete or not at all!
i only wished to give my best take, to the OP, about what was wrote down as to the legal requirements
for carrying a gun in banned cities, in this case portland.
 
Last edited:

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
from the oregon tri-fold, its in the stickies.
city of portland 14.A.60.010 (B)
it is unlawful to carry a fire arm and its magazine in a public place,
recklessly having failed to remove the ammo from the magazine! (paraphrased)

i see now that your real argument with me here, is really about your feeling about the validity of the law itself.
I agree with you,, preemption should be complete or not at all!
i only wished to give my best take, to the OP, about what was wrote down as to the legal requirements
for carrying a gun in banned cities, in this case portland.

IMO - Portland has no authority to ban loaded handguns nor magazines - I am not alone in that judgment.

"restrict the gun rights of law-abiding citizens and will also likely end up in court because they violate Oregon's firearms pre-emption law."
http://www.oregoncatalyst.com/index...ayor-Adams-5-gun-law-rules-will-not-work.html
 

1245A Defender

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
4,365
Location
north mason county, Washington, USA
how helpful

IMO - Portland has no authority to ban loaded handguns nor magazines - I am not alone in that judgment.

"restrict the gun rights of law-abiding citizens and will also likely end up in court because they violate Oregon's firearms pre-emption law."
http://www.oregoncatalyst.com/index...ayor-Adams-5-gun-law-rules-will-not-work.html

i like the way neither you nor psstpoc?, bothered to answer the OPs questions,
or to offer guidence in following the law, so he can stay out of trouble..
but you come on here, after i have done my best to expose the hoops he must jump thru.
and bring up all the counter laws to justify pushing the outer edges of sanity.
every state has some crazy crap in the rules, and there is always someone that
points out that it is unenforceable.
who will post his bail, pay his lawyer, feed his family while he sits in a cell??
because all you have done for him, is to set him up to become a test case
for your grand ideas about how the laws should be interpreted in your perfect world view.
you could be more helpful!
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
i like the way neither you nor psstpoc?, bothered to answer the OPs questions,
or to offer guidence in following the law, so he can stay out of trouble..
but you come on here, after i have done my best to expose the hoops he must jump thru.
and bring up all the counter laws to justify pushing the outer edges of sanity.
every state has some crazy crap in the rules, and there is always someone that
points out that it is unenforceable.
who will post his bail, pay his lawyer, feed his family while he sits in a cell??
because all you have done for him, is to set him up to become a test case
for your grand ideas about how the laws should be interpreted in your perfect world view.
you could be more helpful!

Who exactly suggested that anybody should be the poster boy for the local Seppuku Society?

This is not an "I" vs "you" issue nor is an effective reply limited to one perspective. Preemption is not a "counter law," it is the paramount issue. Illegal rules and rogue politicians become more formidable by acquiescence - that is the real world.
 
Top