• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

MAIG is at it Again - More misuse of statistics

Thundar

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
4,946
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
Link to their report:

http://www.mayorsagainstillegalguns.org/downloads/pdf/trace_the_guns_report.pdf

My snapshot analysis:

1) The MAIG Report falsely assumes all traces are from "crime scenes". Nothing could be further from the truth. Many traces are conducted when nothing illegal has taken place. Take for example the 2009 ATF Trace Data for Virginia. The link lists the top 10 reasons for a trace. 49% of the traces have no indication of illegal activity (Possession of a weapon, none and found)

Link to ATF Virginia 2009 Gun Trace Page:

http://www.atf.gov/statistics/download/trace-data/2009/2009-trace-data-virginia.pdf

Look up Alaska while you are there 57% of the traces for Alaska are for non-crime.

2) The correlation is very weak.

70% of all gun traces link back to that state. (30% relevance)

39% of traces are not linked at all (61% relevance)

50% of traces are for non-crime (50% relevance)

30% x 61% x 50% = 9% relevance of out of state firearms trace to crime. I am fairly certain that there is a much higher correlation between govt. corruption and crime than out of state gun traces and crime.

Lots more to talk about, but for now I have to get back to my day job.
 

SFCRetired

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2008
Messages
1,764
Location
Montgomery, Alabama, USA
Old saw: Figures don't lie, but liars do figure.

The whole thing is about power and control. You cannot wield power and control the masses as long as those masses are armed.

No less a personage than Isoroku Yamamoto realized this when he said that the mainland of the United States could never be invaded because, "there would be a gun behind every blade of grass."

Bloomberg and all the other like-minded anti-gun folks are all about power and control. They will use every argument, deception, and flat-out lie that it takes to achieve their goals. This, btw, includes a whole bunch over at the UN.

Personal opinion: Vote the American clowns out of office and then take two further actions: Get the United States out of the UN and then get the UN out of the United States. I firmly believe that the majority of nations in the UN hate the United States for no other reason than we have rights and freedoms they can only dream about.
 

Bobarino

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
295
Location
Puyallup, Washington, USA

The Donkey

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
1,114
Location
Northern Virginia
One of the main problems with the report is that it calculates each States' "Crime Gun Export Rate" as the the total number of "Crime Guns" that have crossed state lines per 100,000 of population.

It does not measure the number of exported "Crime Guns" as a proportion of the total number of initial gun sales per state.

I suspect that there is a strong correlation between the total number of exported "crime guns" and the total number of gun sales, because the more guns that are sold, the more likely they are to cross state lines and become the subject of a police trace.

There is also likely to be a strong negative correlation between the enactment of certain gun control measures -- such as a state's requirement that the police provide a permit for each gun sale -- and a reduction in the total number of gun sales.

There would be nothing particularly remarkable about a finding that reducing the total number of gun sales in a state would reduce the total number of guns exported by and then traced to that state: But such a study doesn't serve MAIG's purposes.
 
Top