Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Lund v. Salt Lake City

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Provo, Utah, USA

    Lund v. Salt Lake City

    I just heard on the news that Lund settled for $100,000 and his medical costs.

    For those who don't remember the case, Lund was tackled by police because they had a MWAG call. The District Court held that Officer Curdie did not have immunity and noted that:

    "As articulated by the Utah Legislature, public policy in this State may fairly be read to condone and even encourage gun ownership and the lawful possession and carrying of firearms in public places. Salt Lake City’s asserted governmental interest in its police officers’ response to a report of a “man with a gun” in a public park cannot be weighed in isolation from this oft-emphasized public policy. In that context, there may well be more individual constitutional rights at stake than the Fourth Amendment freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures."

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    , ,
    It is time that SOME Judges take up for those of us who are within The Law.

  3. #3
    Regular Member LovesHisXD45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    , Utah, USA
    I would like to talk to that guy's lawyer. I could use his services.
    If it isn't broke, then don't fix it, or you'll fix it until it's broke.

  4. #4
    State Researcher Kevin Jensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Santaquin, Utah, USA
    "An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life." Robert A. Heinlein

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts