My only issues with Kwik were - his inability to answer legitimate questions, and then ignoring those who asked, his wanton disregard for the safety of others around him, his want to sue, he claimed to carry in locations where it was illegal to do so, and anyone who did not act as he demanded were labeled anti-gun.
(I will be attacked in 3, 2,...)
That off topic point said. OC is good. Great deterrent.
And that off topic point said,
Slow, I think, just wants to stir some stuff up with the ones he targeted in the post.
Negative.
It was merely to point out that those who came to bash a confirmed open carrier, were in fact not interested in sustaining conversational discourse after a mere 1 member left the forum.
This member was the only glue binding them here in any way, and it was merely so they could stalk/defame/libel him.
The entire string of arguments were made, quite clearly, under the guise of "supporting open carry, but not agreeing with kwik".
This site is probably the premier Open Carry community for those wishing to share their thoughts, ideas, concerns, or questions. It is the Open Carry "melting pot", so to speak.
Long ago (I would have to dig to find the posts), several people (including myself) hit the nail on the head by stating that people merely joined, or came over from other forums to simply bash said member, and that as soon as said member left or otherwise, they would disappear too.
Their concerns were not Open Carry related whatsoever, nor was their true backing of Open Carry likely ever a factor.
This is the point, and I think after 2-3 months of them not posting, it is well made.
Thanks.