Dave Workman
Regular Member
Well, that was disappointing.
Why?
Well, that was disappointing.
That was indeed very disappointing...
Schram "Here's what happened..."
Schram "This is why I think you should just give your ID"
Dave "You shouldn't Have to"
Schram "Well, i think you're wrong and we have to wrap it up"
That's essentially the conversation I heard...
And that's why Ken Schramm is considered by many to be Seattle's #1 Liberal A-hole. Unlike Mayors that come and go, "Schrammie" keeps going on, and on, and on.
Well, that was disappointing.
Why?
When I'm on the air in an analyst function, I'm NOT YOUR ADVOCATE.
Remember, Schram introduced me as Senior editor of Gun Week....this was a short discussion of the situation.
I offered the overview of the divided opinions about this in the broad firearms community, and with the limited time, did that as best as possible. It's YOUR job as OC activists/advocates to jam Schrambo's phone lines and make your points.
I hadn't heard anything about Schram prior to the interview, so I thought that it would be a non-biased interview...
handgun against a bear would be more likely to piss them off more.
Really? My .44 Mag and .45 Colt Ruger loads won't stop a bear? Guess I should let 'em know to get up and start running again, then. In fact, my 10MM is plenty to stop bear. And that's my "pipsqueak" carry piece.....
When I'm on the air in an analyst function, I'm NOT YOUR ADVOCATE.
Prior to this prodcast Dave consulted with me as to a consenus of our view point and I expressed most of those you all have stated......
Understood , since I was asked I attempted to relate comments, analogies and views I have heard from many here not just mine.Wait, he called ONE person to get a consensus? No offense DEROS but one person does not make a consensus. It makes one persons point of view on a topic.