I challenge you to a duel!

I challenge you to a duel!

Since It's now legal for me to say that now, I went ahead and said it.

I guess I could have said it 4 months ago.


750.171 Repealed Eff. June 22, 2010.

Oh it was:
Engaging in or challenging to fight duel--Any person who shall engage in a duel with any deadly weapon, although no homicide ensue, or who shall challenge another to fight such duel, or shall send or deliver any written or verbal message, purporting or intended to be such challenge, although no duel ensue, shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 10 years or by a fine of not more than 5,000 dollars, and shall also be incapable of holding or of being elected or appointed to any place of honor, profit or trust, under the constitution or laws of this state.

But they couldn't do something useful like repeal PFZ's? *taps toe*

stainless1911 said:

But they couldn't do something useful like repeal PFZ's? *taps toe*

Click to expand...

Agreed. Tax dollars at work.

I had just found this old story:
http://www.michiganpolicy.com/index...atid=237:employment-current-issues&Itemid=353

what's a calange?

Outdoor clothing of course!



Hey spelling is off topic!

Calange

kyleplusitunes said:

what's a calange?

Click to expand...

isn't it a cross between a Merange and a collage?

perhaps kyle and op should settle this with a duel.:dude:

Meanwhile, Maryland still has trial by combat. Has to be plaintiff or plaintiff's lawyer vs defendant or defendant's lawyer. In a criminal case, it's prosecutor vs either defendant or defense counsel. Back in the 80s, a lawyer friend of mine was defending a guy against a bogus assault charge. Rather than move to dismiss, he challenged the DA. Since Ed had stomped into the courtroom in his (incredibly fugly) SCA armor with a couple of oak staves and thrown a gauntlet at the DA's feet, the DA moved (hastily) to dismiss.