• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Pierce County prosecutor gets it right

TheJeepster

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
95
Location
, ,
Good quote. What is it exactly that the ATF gets wrong? I didn't see anything about the ATF in that article, unless I missed it.

Two part article. The ATF portion was at the bottom. The are banning M1 Garands from entering the country from S Korea. (or something like that) Confused me to when the article jumped.
 

TheJeepster

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
95
Location
, ,
Seems like a decent quote to me.


I'm thinking the quote SHOULD have been:

“You break into somebody’s house [strike]with a gun[/strike],” he said matter-of-factly, “you take the chance you’re going to get shot.”
 

maclean

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
378
Location
, ,
I'm thinking the quote SHOULD have been:

“You break into somebody’s house [strike]with a gun[/strike],” he said matter-of-factly, “you take the chance you’re going to get shot.”

I took the "sombody's house with a gun" to mean the homeowner, but I agree it can be read both ways.
 
Top