• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Illegal detainment at Starbucks in Old Saybrook

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
I believe the officer names involved are as follows:

Sgt Gardner - Officer who detained me and checked my ID.
Sgt Mercer - Officer who was half uniformed and made many false statements about CT being a concealed carry state and about breach of peace.
Sgt Roche - Officer who answered as shift supervisor when I called the Old Saybrook police department right after the incident.

There was another officer on scene who continued the detainment when Sgt Mercer left. I am not 100% on his name and I don't think it is in the audio so I won't speculate.

I backed this up from their posted roster:

http://www.oldsaybrookct.org/pages/oldsaybrookct_police/departmentRoster
 

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
Spoke with manager of Old Saybrook Starbucks

I got a return phone call today from Greg Thompson who identifies himself as the manager of Old Saybrook Starbucks.

He seems to be aware of the legality of open carry (now) and says I am welcome back anytime. He was apologetic for what happened.

He mentioned that the employee indicated that they were nervous due to a bunch of crime happening lately in Old Saybrook. I think we both were in agreement this is not a reasonable justification to expel someone and mock them from a restaurant that publicly welcomes law abiding citizens (armed or otherwise) in their restaurants all across the country.

He assures me that it will not happen again and that I am welcome. He also says that he will have his district manager call me. That will be good, because before I step foot in the restaurant again, I will need to make sure I have a letter from the district manager saying that I am welcome there as long as I am obeying the law whether I am armed or not. I am not going to take the risk of entering that store again and giving Sgt Gardner the excuse he seems to be hot for and let him arrest me for trespass.
 

MGoduto

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
107
Location
New Britain, Connecticut, USA
Poor Rich!!!

I seem to be a good magnet for the really odd encounters, but this one takes the cake so far.

This morning I was sitting with my girlfriend at the bar area in the Old Saybrook Starbucks. I was open carrying like I normally do. We were both using our laptops, me doing some work, she was working on school work. The bar area is behind the main seating area, but we sit there because it has more space for us to spread out and get real work done. The area is not highly visible, but plenty of people can see us.

This is not at all our first time working in Starbucks (especially since they made the WIFI free!), and I open carry just about everywhere. Also, knowing Starbucks' national policy, we were even more at ease than normal (which is really relaxed!).

We were there for maybe about an hour when I started noticing various employees looking at me funny. Shortly after, two Old Saybrook police officers walk in. One turns out to be Sergeant Gardner. The other is without his uniform shirt. Sergeant Gardner walks up to where I am sitting and says hello. I turn around, say hello back, and turn back to my work.

He then asks me to step outside with him. I ask him "I'm sorry, am I being detained?". He replies that I am. I say ok, no problem. I then ask him if he minds if I reach in my pocket. He says ok, I do, he for some reason gets a bit alarmed, but I show him it is just my voice recorder. He seems fine with this. I arm the recorder and start recording.

As we walk outside, the officer proceeds to tell me that Connecticut is a 'concealed carry state'. I inform him that it is not. We get outside, where Sergeant Gardner proceeds to request my pistol permit. I reply to this effect:

"I will do that, but I want you to understand beforehand that I do not consent to any searches or seizures and that I am only giving you my permit under duress."

During which he rudely interrupts several times with demands for my ID. I make sure to finish, and supply him with my permit. He pauses for a second and then tells me he needs my drivers license as well. I again protest and tell him I don't understand what he needs it for since he should be more than fine with my permit. He insists (belligerently) and I again make it clear I am doing so under duress.

He takes my ID over to the parking lot where I assume he ran my IDs which obviously turn up nothing. During the time I speak to the other officer (his name escapes me at the moment, but I did get him to introduce himself on the recording). We have a bit of a conversation where I explain that he is incorrect about CT being a 'concealed carry state' and that open carry is legal and that they are not allowed under law to detain me or demand my ID. He of course does not agree. He states that I 'alarmed people' and that I would be subject to arrest for breach of peace. I politely but assertively inform him that breach of peace is a settled issue and that he is incorrect and that making an arrest like he is talking about would be a bad idea legally. We debate very briefly about the language of the statute, but I can tell he is only going to give me the standard drivel that we always get, and I choose to hand over the CCDL documents instead and invite him to take a good look since I think he could stand a refresher course on the law in CT.

He also makes the statement that I should look at my permit and that it is a 'concealed carry permit'. I tell it would be difficult to do so since they had seized it from me, but if he had a permit I would be happy to show him the error in his understanding. He says he does have a permit, but never produces it. What a shame.

A new officer arrives on scene and relieves the officer detaining me. The Sergeant is still on the radio, and I think talking to another (possibly superior) officer who has arrived. The new officer walks up and I strike up a conversation with him. I indicate "Just so you know I am armed, I am not sure what you know about this". He says that of course he knows I am armed, that is why he is here. No problem, just making sure I don't get shot or tackled by a nervous LEO who is not properly briefed on the situation.

I ask the new officer "Are you aware open carry is legal in CT?". He replies "Yes". I laugh a bit and make a point that I shouldn't be detained if it is legal. He backtracks and says they are still trying to determine legality and such. That is fine. Whatever.

We talk a little bit more, I present him the same documents to help him out.

The Sergeant comes back to me and hands me my ID. The way he approached, I thought for sure I was being handcuffed, but obviously could not be too worried considering how wrong they were. It would have been a shame to waste my coffee though.

To my surprise it seems I am free to go. Sounds like someone talked this Sergeant down and explained the error in his thinking. Good on whoever did that. I wish they had been the responder and then maybe I wouldn't have been illegally detained in the first place.

The Sergeant goes inside to talk to the employees. I should mention that the first officer to detain me indicated that an employee (!!) had called them when I asked if this was a citizen complaint. He goes in, comes out a few minutes later and tells me I am free to go, but they don't want me inside. I say I understand that it is their right, but that I need to grab my laptop and my stuff before I go. He escorts me in and I pack up. During this time, I tell him he is letting me go, so he must have found out it is legal. He indicates that he still does not agree.

I find that point interesting. He feels I am breaking the law, but does not arrest me. Surprisingly, he doesn't even mention that I should conceal or anything else (I hear about this from most arrest free encounters).

So here I am. I am at the Meriden Starbucks now, no arrest, but in almost exactly the same condition as St. John from New Mexico.

http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...olice-pay-21-000-to-settle-open-carry-lawsuit

Interestingly enough, I was never disarmed though. I guess that is a step in the right direction? I still don't think any of this is acceptable, so this a pretty small consolation.

Now, for Starbucks involvement, I have tried contacting them, but they are not open on weekends, so I guess I will pursue this during the week. I think some serious violations of policy and customer relations happened here. We were all made to believe that their policy was that they would defer to state law and they would not provide a problem for open carriers as long as no law is being broken. And yet, I had the police called and I was asked to leave the store.

I cannot imagine it will be too difficult to rectify this through their customer relations, but I guess I will find out. I am more than a little disappointed in them. I wouldn't be able to argue too much if a customer had done this, but this was their employee.

We confirmed this a bit since my girlfriend was still inside when I was detained and listened to the employees mock, criticize and joke about my detainment stating opinions like "he can't do that, it needs to be concealed!" and such nonsense. Apparently she also got the clear impression of the actual employee who called it in, who was boasting about it.

Also, we have information that the police disclosed my permit status to the manager for no reason. Something I will pursue when I have the opportunity. That is another CT statute we need to make sure the Old Saybrook PD learns about.

More later, I will definitely release the recording when I have a chance to go over it and make sure no personal information (like I have any anymore thanks to officers...) is contained. I think I also need to trim the end off the recording since I think I let the recorder run a bit long.

Listened to a bit of it, and I think I got most of it. It is really windy today though and they made me stand outside shivering while I was detained, so it might be a little noisy. I will do my best.

Thanks everyone for beating it into my head to have a recorder. I think this should be a great example for future OCers what a CT police encounter can be like and how to respond appropriately. I will let you guys judge for yourselves though.

More to come... stay tuned...

Rich:

Jesus H. Christ!

Will you PLEASE stop going out wearing that t-shirt that says 'Open Carrier - feel free to call the cops'. Or maybe you p***** - off your girlfriend and she has something programmed on her phone to auto-dial the cops.

It seems that wherever you go, controversy follows. Maybe you need to start being an ******* so that everyone will leave you alone, and not bring that Evil Black Laptop with you.
 

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
Rich:

Jesus H. Christ!

Will you PLEASE stop going out wearing that t-shirt that says 'Open Carrier - feel free to call the cops'. Or maybe you pissed-off your girlfriend and she has something programmed on her phone to auto-dial the cops.

It seems that wherever you go, controversy follows. Maybe you need to start being an ******* so that everyone will leave you alone, and not bring that Evil Black Laptop with you.

Tell me about it. The whole polite, professional and law abiding thing doesn't seem to be working for me!

Although this incident was a refreshing change of pace when compared to Wallingford, it is still alarming that we have officers in this state that don't understand basic law and basic 4th amendment rights, including terry stops.

Just another thing to fix I guess...
 

danr71

Regular Member
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
15
Location
, ,
Rich,

I love how the officer says "other than a handgun in plain view, so if you were carrying a shotgun I wouldn't bother you" ... somehow I HIGHLY doubt that.

Maybe start carrying a shotgun strapped to your back, and they would just leave you alone.
And has anyone thought about carrying a long gun around, seeing that you don't need a permit for it.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Rich,

I love how the officer says "other than a handgun in plain view, so if you were carrying a shotgun I wouldn't bother you" ... somehow I HIGHLY doubt that.

Maybe start carrying a shotgun strapped to your back, and they would just leave you alone.
And has anyone thought about carrying a long gun around, seeing that you don't need a permit for it.

(14) LONG GUN CARRY IS OFF-TOPIC: This web site is focused on the right to openly carry properly holstered handguns in daily American life. We do NOT promote the carry of long guns. Long guns are great! OCDO co-founders John & Mike and most of the members of this forum own at least one long gun - but due to urban area issues of muzzle control, lack of trigger guard coverage, and the fact that the long gun carry issue distracts from our main mission to promote the open carry of handguns in daily life, we will leave long gun carry activism in the capable hands of the future founders of web sites about long gun carry.
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/misc.php?do=showrules
 

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
Rich,

I love how the officer says "other than a handgun in plain view, so if you were carrying a shotgun I wouldn't bother you" ... somehow I HIGHLY doubt that.

Maybe start carrying a shotgun strapped to your back, and they would just leave you alone.
And has anyone thought about carrying a long gun around, seeing that you don't need a permit for it.

I found that funny as well. And then he reads the first line and eats his words. Whoops. Selective hearing isn't going to get him anywhere.
 

Alex.EastHartford.

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
112
Location
East Hartford, Connecticut, USA
But I love my CCDL shirt

Me too. I just purchase the blue one at last CCDL meeting on the 10-12-10. Rich B try hot pink and maybe your luck will change. (just kidding) Rich. I am just trying to eaze the tension for what we gone througth. also ED.P I will buy a tape recorder. Thanks you guys and CCDL. CARRY ON!
 

KIX

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
960
Location
, ,
I'm looking forward to the District Manager's response.

I too, like my CCDL shirts, but it's getting nipply out. Maybe we need to get some long sleeve versions!

Alex..... shame on you for mocking..... I think Rich and I have the perfect figures to "ROCK" that hot pink CCDL shirt!

Jonathan
 

Mopar

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
29
Location
, Connecticut, USA
Tell me about it. The whole polite, professional and law abiding thing doesn't seem to be working for me!

I hate to say this, and it ain't right.... but appearance matters even more then the whole polite, professional and law abiding thing. By the time you open your mouth people/police (right or wrong) have usually already formed an opinion of you. I've done the Jesus look, with super long hair and facial hair. I've done the ponytail thing. I've done the neat and short and clean shaven thing. I can tell you there is a HUGE difference in the way you are treated both by the police and the general public. Again, it shouldn't be that way, but I bet if Rich got himself a cop-cut his "interesting" encounters would drop to nil.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
I hate to say this, and it ain't right.... but appearance matters even more then the whole polite, professional and law abiding thing. By the time you open your mouth people/police (right or wrong) have usually already formed an opinion of you. I've done the Jesus look, with super long hair and facial hair. I've done the ponytail thing. I've done the neat and short and clean shaven thing. I can tell you there is a HUGE difference in the way you are treated both by the police and the general public. Again, it shouldn't be that way, but I bet if Rich got himself a cop-cut his "interesting" encounters would drop to nil.

We are what other people perceive us to be - it is their opinion that counts to them.

First impressions are lasting and effect what follows.

We can ignore it, deny it or work with it - we each make our own decisions and how we deal with them.
 

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
Rich B try hot pink and maybe your luck will change. (just kidding) Rich.

Don't laugh. I have considered this.
Would make it a lot more comical when I get those standard LEO lines like "you must have know people were going to panic!". Really? Dressed in pink?

Of course right now I have months worth of experience to know that is 100% untrue and ridiculous.
 
Last edited:

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
CT is an open carry state. I know this... and I've never even been in CT. I've been a cop too... and it was my obligation... (duty) to be aware of the criminality of actions that I was most likely to encounter. It's called law enforcement, not opinion enforcement. I would expect any LEO of SGT grade to be more than aware of actual law in effect. This 'SGT Gardner' abused his authority under color of law due.... in the main because he does not approve of open carry. Most likely, he does not belive that regular citizens should be armed at all. That's what I glean from his attitude as described. He KNEW OC was legal... or he would have disarmed you at 1st contact. The drivers license thing was a fishing expedition for any warrants.

Now... about these CCDL shirts. I dunno if it's a novelty to carry openly in CT for some of you or not, but advertising 'look at me' can have a negative effect. It's an 'in you face' kind'a thing. The kind'a thing that could (and did) trigger some 'anti' counter droid in a fast food joint to call the cops just to be snarky about it. I don't carry to make a statement... I purpose carry for self-defense. If the world was all sweetness and light, I wouldn't holster 2.5lbs of loaded steel on my hip everyday... but the world is not sweetness and light.

As for him trespassing you... that's not his job. You were not asked to leave by management or any employee. That's their right... but they didn't do that. Essentially they're cowards as most libs are in such things. I realize there's a much different social dynamic regarding openly carrying handguns in the east. That attitude in endemic and won't change anytime soon. 'In your face' pink shirts don't help.
 
Last edited:

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
CT is an open carry state. I know this... and I've never even been in CT. I've been a cop too... and it was my obligation... (duty) to be aware of the criminality of actions that I was most likely to encounter. It's called law enforcement, not opinion enforcement. I would expect any LEO of SGT grade to be more than aware of actual law in effect. This 'SGT Gardner' abused his authority under color of law due.... in the main because he does not approve of open carry. Most likely, he does not belive that regular citizens should be armed at all. That's what I glean from his attitude as described. He KNEW OC was legal... or he would have disarmed you at 1st contact.

Agreed 100%. I got the same impression in my dealings with Sgt Gardner. He was told OC is legal by me, and apparently someone in his department (he was talking with someone on the radio that must have informed him).
He refused to look at the documents that the other officers were interested in. When we went back in, when I was free to go and I was not unarmed, concealing or anything else, he said he was "not convinced". That really says to me that "I know it is legal, but I don't agree with it". I am sure he was and will be looking for any excuse to bring his personal form of justice against any open carrier.

The drivers license thing was a fishing expedition for any warrants.

That is what I figured as well. He could not give an excuse to my repeated protests, but he sure escalated the situation to obtain it readily.

Now... about these CCDL shirts. I dunno if it's a novelty to carry openly in CT for some of you or not, but advertising 'look at me' can have a negative effect. It's an 'in you face' kind'a thing. The kind'a thing that could (and did) trigger some 'anti' counter droid in a fast food joint to call the cops just to be snarky about it. I don't carry to make a statement... I purpose carry for self-defense.

Agreed. This is why I simply carry as I would normally carry everyday, but I open carry as much as I feel like it (turns out to be most of the time). Sometimes I am not in the mood for any kind of potential attention. My rule is to be 'polite and professional' at all times. If I don't think I am capable of that, I will conceal. Just my personal choice in how to handle things.

The CCDL shirts are nice. I like to advertise. However, they are just a normal part of my wardrobe. I wear them when I conceal, when I OC, whenever. So far I have actually found the CCDL shirts to have an interesting effect on people when I am OCing, but I am not sure I can provide any science behind it.

If the world was all sweetness and light, I wouldn't holster 2.5lbs of loaded steel on my hip everyday... but the world is not sweetness and light.

+1

As for him trespassing you... that's not his job. You were not asked to leave by management or any employee.

Yes I was. He went in and told the staff I was doing nothing illegal and that I would be free to go. They said they did not want me to stay at the restaurant.

That's their right... but they didn't do that. Essentially they're cowards as most libs are in such things. I realize there's a much different social dynamic regarding openly carrying handguns in the east. That attitude in endemic and won't change anytime soon.

I don't understand where you get this idea, but I hear it a lot. NH, VT, CT and probably others are definite 'open carry states'. VT you need no permit at all. CT you need a permit. NH gave me a permit for 20 bucks and a photocopy of my CT permit.

To say that the East Coast is somehow an exception to feelings on firearms is disingenuous at best. It would imply (like Sgt Mercer and his replacement did) that my open carrying would result in panicked crowds everywhere I go.

This could not be further from the truth. If anything, we (my girlfriend and I) have noticed a mostly positive trend where ever we go when I OC. Many people walk up and talk to me and ask me about the laws and such. I have been approached by state employees who are apparently being censored by their employer to not talk to people like me and to not admit that we live in a free state. I have business owners that know me by name and welcome me in. Some of those establishments would likely normally be considered 'anti 2A' establishments. Have you ever seen someone OC in a Ben and Jerrys and had the owner welcome him back anytime despite having a short conversation about firearms laws and politics where disagreements were had?

Sure our state may lean to the left, but I experience many people everyday who can see past their persuasions and who welcome differing viewpoints.

My problems while OCing, while minimal, can be attributed to the responding officers and their lack of education, training and professionalism more than I can ever attribute anything to the citizens around me.

One employee made the call at Starbucks (as far as I know so far), and 3 officers violated my rights and broke their oaths. That is a ratio to think about.

'In your face' pink shirts don't help.

Don't forget to factor in humor. We are not always serious about everything here. I don't try to draw attention to myself, but I also will be sure to feel free to wear whatever I would normally wear and do the activities I would normally do.

The law has no language that prohibits a man wearing a pink shirt while OC, nor does it have any prohibitions on OC wardrobe at all.
 
Last edited:

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
I don't understand where you get this idea, but I hear it a lot. NH, VT, CT and probably others are definite 'open carry states'. VT you need no permit at all. CT you need a permit. NH gave me a permit for 20 bucks and a photocopy of my CT permit.

To say that the East Coast is somehow an exception to feelings on firearms is disingenuous at best. It would imply (like Sgt Mercer and his replacement did) that my open carrying would result in panicked crowds everywhere I go.

This could not be further from the truth. If anything, we (my girlfriend and I) have noticed a mostly positive trend where ever we go when I OC. Many people walk up and talk to me and ask me about the laws and such. I have been approached by state employees who are apparently being censored by their employer to not talk to people like me and to not admit that we live in a free state. I have business owners that know me by name and welcome me in. Some of those establishments would likely normally be considered 'anti 2A' establishments. Have you ever seen someone OC in a Ben and Jerrys and had the owner welcome him back anytime despite having a short conversation about firearms laws and politics where disagreements were had?

Sure our state may lean to the left, but I experience many people everyday who can see past their persuasions and who welcome differing viewpoints.

My problems while OCing, while minimal, can be attributed to the responding officers and their lack of education, training and professionalism more than I can ever attribute anything to the citizens around me.

One employee made the call at Starbucks (as far as I know so far), and 3 officers violated my rights and broke their oaths. That is a ratio to think about.



Don't forget to factor in humor. We are not always serious about everything here. I don't try to draw attention to myself, but I also will be sure to feel free to wear whatever I would normally wear and do the activities I would normally do.

The law has no language that prohibits a man wearing a pink shirt while OC, nor does it have any prohibitions on OC wardrobe at all.

Where did I get this idea? I lived there (MD). If RKBA was understood and accepted... there would be no 'responding officers'. There would be no 'opinion enforcement'... harrassment. (Article 1: Section 15 of the Connecticut Constitution.)
911 dispatcher wouldn't respond in that fashion. The emplyee wouldn't have dropped a dime on you to begin with. Starbucks corporate policy is universally accepted to be IAW state law. The premisis was not posted.

You need only to read this forum of the many harrassments/arrrests of open carriers in the east... even where state constitutions are clear. VA, PA, GA, DE. I just had a long conversation with a couple from DE (in Tombstone) who said... Yeah... OC is 'legal' in DE... but if you do it you'll get arrested. The majority of the east is hung up on 'permit' as tho RKBA was a privlege granted by the state. That's near endemic with the exception of VT. MD. DC, NJ, NY... forgetaboutit. MA? Seriously? RI? Unicorns maybe. I'm not being disingenious... those are facts. People 'being censored by their employer' does not bode well for acceptance either.

There's nothing humorous about being armed. It's not a fashion statement either.
 

Gunslinger

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
3,853
Location
Free, Colorado, USA
(14) LONG GUN CARRY IS OFF-TOPIC: This web site is focused on the right to openly carry properly holstered handguns in daily American life. We do NOT promote the carry of long guns. Long guns are great! OCDO co-founders John & Mike and most of the members of this forum own at least one long gun - but due to urban area issues of muzzle control, lack of trigger guard coverage, and the fact that the long gun carry issue distracts from our main mission to promote the open carry of handguns in daily life, we will leave long gun carry activism in the capable hands of the future founders of web sites about long gun carry.
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/misc.php?do=showrules

So, I'll get another mean PM if I advocate carrying my M-61A1 Vulcan Gattling gun around openly?

The OP needs to follow up with no less than an official complaint. The dick sgt needs to be educated before he spreads his moronic interpretation of the law around to other people. Even after he is (evidently) told he was wrong by a superiour, he "doesn't believe it." Typical CT cop. Probably came from MD.
 
Top