eye95
Well-known member
Except I've seen numerous examples of both of these.
Citation?
Except I've seen numerous examples of both of these.
Citation?
Hard to cite real life events.
Easy to claim real life events.
I smell BS.
Try showering.
No but really, I say "I have witnessed this happen," you say "You're lying." Neither of us can prove our point. There's really nowhere to go with this if you refuse to believe an eyewitness account.
I did not say that you were lying. I asked you to back up your assertion. You can't or won't. I am moving on. Because of your reply, permanently.
You're asking us to take you - a complete stranger that we know nothing about - on your word only, without any shred of proof. Do you realize just how stupid that is?Try showering.
No but really, I say "I have witnessed this happen," you say "You're lying." Neither of us can prove our point. There's really nowhere to go with this if you refuse to believe an eyewitness account.
You're asking us to take you - a complete stranger that we know nothing about - on your word only, without any shred of proof. Do you realize just how stupid that is?
Gee, that's their definition of "compromise", too.bipartisanship means giving up the fight and just going along with the Democrat leadership.
Since you appear to not understand why a completely anonymous and unproven claim on an Internet forum is so quickly discarded, may I suggest some reading for you. Hopefully you can grasp it.Feel free to come follow me around with a video camera if you absolutely must have proof of things that happen in my presence.
Since you appear to not understand why a completely anonymous and unproven claim on an Internet forum is so quickly discarded, may I suggest some reading for you. Hopefully you can grasp it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof
since you appear to not understand why a completely anonymous and unproven claim on an internet forum is so quickly discarded, may i suggest some reading for you. Hopefully you can grasp it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/hearsay
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/evidence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/philosophic_burden_of_proof
Feel free to come follow me around with a video camera if you absolutely must have proof of things that happen in my presence.
citing wikipedia!!? Noooooo!!!
bipartisanship means giving up the fight and just going along with the Democrat leadership.
Gee, that's their definition of "compromise", too.
Relax. Independant tests have confirmed it's as accurate as Encyclopedia Britannica, these days. The added benefit is that there are an order of magnitude (10x) more entries.
I don't know what this study is, but I would take issue with it.
There are folks who change articles on a daily basis to eliminate content with which they disagree and to insert controversial content with which they agree.
Here's one of several studies. It was published in Nature, a reputable, peer-reviewed scientific journal.
And there are hundreds of thousands if not millions of subject matter experts who've each taken ownership of one or more articles and revert the articles right back. Compare that to Britannica's permanent and contributing staff of only a thousand or two.