I'm for the rights of citizens to defend personal property even with the use of deadly force. Personal property is obtained by the trading of portions of the limited time we have in this life for wages that are then used to get those items we want/need. Therefore personal property is an extension of our lives and those who would take those things from us are, if fact, taking portions of our lives from us. The difficulty in this view is what kind of limitations should be placed on the use of deadly force to protect personal property. That is the tricky part.