oak1971
Regular Member
Cool. The floor under the ice sheet used to be painted blue. It made the ice look sort of milky blue.. was pretty cool.
Last time I was there was in the 1970's. I'll take your word for it.
Cool. The floor under the ice sheet used to be painted blue. It made the ice look sort of milky blue.. was pretty cool.
Yes, it was false bravado.
If you have to ask..you know the rest.
I like mine better. "Guns cause gun violence like diapers cause people to poop." Same crappy logic!Nooooooo! it's not a gun fight until someone attempts to disarm, or use lethal force against someone who is lawfully carrying a gun. guns cause fights like flies cause garbage.
... four points to keep in mind should a defensive shooting situation occur. Number one was You must be a reluctant participant. In other words, you cannot go looking for a fight. You must be innocent of instigation or provocation. Had the confrontation with the boomboxers gone south, a jury would have little doubt that if the gun hadn't been there, or had the confronter tried other means, the deadly situation may not have occurred.
wow, ill just get my gun and go scare the neighbors.
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/forewarned-is-forearmed.htmlRemember, its not a gun fight until someone brings a gun
I didn't go "looking for a fight", .
In my mind she should not need to PROVE that she didn't go to instigate a fight. It should be the other party that would need to prove this... SOMETHING ABOUT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!
Asking them politely to stop breaking the law [not in those words, no] was instigation & looking for a fight?
If that reasoning holds true, it's all the more reason to have the means to protect myself from their response.
I didn't go "looking for a fight", I went to ask them to turn down the noise. I thought that they might be a bit reluctant to do so, because they'd been ignoring the law for a couple hours already, and didn't want it to devolve into several of them beating on one of me, so carried for my own protection.
If I hadn't been armed, and they had gotten upset, a deadly situation may well have occurred - one where I ended up beaten to a pulp by the 3 of them. (And I'd make a lot of pulp... not a pretty sight.)
I looked at city records to find the address & owner, and now have a phone # for future use... if they can hear it. If they don't, at least I can tell the police I tried to contact him. Now back to hiding in my house & hoping they'll eventually shut up, 'cause the police won't do anything in time.
omg, we now have a spartacus from arizona.
This is getting out of hand. If she wanted to be put on trial she could have posted on Democrat Underground forum instead of here.
The issue isn't whether she should open carry. The issue is that she INITIATED a confrontation while openly armed. For those of you who cannot see past " I can open carry, it's legal and I always open carry!!!" this is a problem. LE would almost certainly assume she was the aggressor in the scenario because she started it. She wasn't rescuing a drowning baby, saving someone from being mugged, or rescuing a helpless old man from a bear attack. There was some loud music. The possible outcomes made it....not worth it.
I'll be moving to Minocqua in mid December. If any of you people are ever in that area, please wear a patch or something to ID yourselves as members of this websight so I don't get in a discussion with you, you already know everything, even when you ask opinions. lol. I'll be easy to spot. I'm the hard core conservative who is open carrying but avoiding anyone else is OC'ing in case they might be a member of this web sight.
MKEgal, I'm glad it worked out well for you. Best wishes.
Ill say it....
im glad this decision is final!!!
quote, " I'll say it one more time then I'll go away forever. I'll not trouble the members of this websight ever again:" end quote
I'll be moving to Minocqua in mid December.