Gundude
Regular Member
From what I got from the hearing, the SDC attorney was incompetent and uninformed. He didn't know the penal code, couldn't interpret Heller, and ignored McDonald.
Do the Judges notice this and help them by ignoring their ignorance?
Do incompetent attorney's win in spite of themselves?
Is this the best legal mind SDC can afford?
Do the Judges notice this and help them by ignoring their ignorance?
Do incompetent attorney's win in spite of themselves?
Is this the best legal mind SDC can afford?