jimd_21
Regular Member
Extremists.....we have all seen them and had run-ins with them on this forum....what do you think?
Ban....
temp ban....
monitor....
leave alone.....
Ban....
temp ban....
monitor....
leave alone.....
Been there. You'll notice I tried to reason with him. I had him on ignore before he started the libel nonsense. He will be back there soon enough. Life would be better here without him, but ignore accomplishes that almost as well as a ban would.
I don't agree with all of John's and Mike's decisions, but they are the owners and administer this site better than any other owners of any other site I've been on.
it is not our call. As long as folks don't violate the rules, they pretty much can say anything they want. It's up to the owners.
When i find a poster's views ridiculous in their extremity, i just ignore the poster.
You always have the option to ignore. Kwik seems a little high strung to me...just think people should calm down a bit, sometimes.
I am not sure about your proposing that "extremists" be banned. Where do you draw the line? Ignore would be your best option, if you are not interested in what they have to post.
Who are you to call Kwik names? YOU SHOULD BE BANNED FOR NAME CALLING AND LIBEL!!! I mean really now, is it that extreme to think you should be able to carry a sawed off Kalashnikov "pistol" slung over your shoulder and attract no more attention than a guy carrying a glock? Not only is this guy not an extremist, he's even brilliant enough to post memos with his full name, written (I assume) by a PD that REGRETS that it cannot verify he's not been charged for a DV crime, on an internet forum.
If THAT isn't a perfect illustration of the rational actions of a mainstream gun rights activist, I'll have to go tell Charles Manson, who's eating Fruity Pebbles at my dinning room table right now, that he has to go back to jail.
Kwik, you should really be careful though. From what I have read(e) you seem to be seeking out interactions with LEO's. I see nothing wrong with exercising your right to carry, but seeking out interactions is not a good idea, especially with LEO's.
Don't you think it is enough that throughout our daily lives we come into contact with LEO's, uneducated civilians, anti's, and people who target us for victimization?
Don't be so kwik to look for confrontation...get it, kwik=quick, hardy har har Stay safe!
Essentially Mike and John have established rules and set limits for behavior on their forum.
That should give everyone a basis for determining proper behavior and behavior demanding banishment.
So long as one has not exceeded the established limits they SHOULD NOT be banned.
Some folks may find other folks posts distasteful, rude, improbable, even insane, but so long as they reasonably follow the established rules and stay within the forum limits, they should not be banned.
It is, after all, 'rule of law' that the site is established on, not whim.
[video=youtube;YkeOr720S5w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkeOr720S5w[/video]Sorry but as i have read and been told Kwik loves confrontation....whether it be on the street with citizens.....LEO... or people on this forum. I kinda think he has confrontations with himself in the mirror...( and in Idaho he would not be allowed carry/own a firearm/weapon due to unstable mental condition).
Ok don't take this rude, out of context, or any other way but a comparison.
Muslims say they are good people....yet they have few in their religion that take things to the extreme.....are they banned? Or are they left alone to spread their hate and discontent until they are gone and deamed martor's?
Just a thought.......Comparison.....take it as you will but think about it....