Robin47
Regular Member
As we all know PC 12031(e) violates a persons 4th-A, the remedy is to
challenge that 4th-A violation
The option of Leo's is if they want to check to see if your gun is unloaded.
However they must violate your 4th to do it.
There is no 'Constitutional law" that gives them that right, not even PC 12031(e).
its unconstitutional to begin with, making it "Null & Void "from Inception. PC 12031(e) !
Marbury vs.Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137,174,176. (1803). Also:
16 AM Jur 2d,sec 177 late 2d, sec 256. Also:
Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442.
There is one more way a remedy would work, to challenge PC 12031(e).
Being as Leo's follow orders, to cut back on that power, with an unconstitutional laws being Enforced
on "We the People", we need to" File a Restraining Order" against the Sheriff's Dept, and all other
law enforcement dept in your respective counties.
That way the Leo's won't have to violate your 4th-A, neither would they have to check you
but just ask you. ( Is that loaded?). NO - UOC.
Now the question might come up, "What if the court Judge" won't give you a Restraining Order, to prevent a violation of your rights" ?
Then you can file a Title 18 Section 241, on that judge, and any officers who have violated your rights
at anytime in the past, or might in the future.
I guess you could call this "E-Checks gone wild" !
Anyway in the Federal Court suit, the question would come up about the Constitutionality of PC 12031(e).
Its not Leo's we are fighting but bad laws ! The Leo's are just following orders, kind of like foot soldiers.
So let me hear from you your opinions !
Robin47
challenge that 4th-A violation
The option of Leo's is if they want to check to see if your gun is unloaded.
However they must violate your 4th to do it.
There is no 'Constitutional law" that gives them that right, not even PC 12031(e).
its unconstitutional to begin with, making it "Null & Void "from Inception. PC 12031(e) !
Marbury vs.Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137,174,176. (1803). Also:
16 AM Jur 2d,sec 177 late 2d, sec 256. Also:
Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442.
There is one more way a remedy would work, to challenge PC 12031(e).
Being as Leo's follow orders, to cut back on that power, with an unconstitutional laws being Enforced
on "We the People", we need to" File a Restraining Order" against the Sheriff's Dept, and all other
law enforcement dept in your respective counties.
That way the Leo's won't have to violate your 4th-A, neither would they have to check you
but just ask you. ( Is that loaded?). NO - UOC.
Now the question might come up, "What if the court Judge" won't give you a Restraining Order, to prevent a violation of your rights" ?
Then you can file a Title 18 Section 241, on that judge, and any officers who have violated your rights
at anytime in the past, or might in the future.
I guess you could call this "E-Checks gone wild" !
Anyway in the Federal Court suit, the question would come up about the Constitutionality of PC 12031(e).
Its not Leo's we are fighting but bad laws ! The Leo's are just following orders, kind of like foot soldiers.
So let me hear from you your opinions !
Robin47