I agree with ya. Someone who trained on a 1911, but is proficient with a glock won't have nearly as big of a problem if he needs the glock in a self defense situation, compared to someone who trained with a glock, but is proficient with a 1911. Since all of my handguns (except a couple of kel-tecs not suitable for oc or cc) don't have safeties, I'd be in trouble if the fecal matter came in contact with a multi-bladed rotating device and I was carrying a handgun with a safety on it.
While I respect your opinions, my experiences differ slightly. For the majority of my carry years I preferred the Springfield Model 1911 Compact (6 + 1 using .45 ACP). I carried cocked and locked. The safety release was part of the sight alignment and was burned into my consciousness.
Now, I find the Springfield XD with 4 inch barrel to be preferable. I have no problems transitioning between the two. (At least not yet.) When I practice at the range, I make sure that at least one of my "fun" guns is a Model 1911.
Because I have trained with a variety of handguns, I take care to look intently at the one I holster each day and review the features of that particular handgun in my head. This "sets" my brain and muscle memory for that handgun. Others may have different experiences or differing opinions, but so far what I am doing has worked for me. As I have heard it said so often in other forums, "your mileage may vary".
As for the Kel-Tek, I agree that this type of handgun is not optimal for primary carry, but my "Back Up Gun" (BUG) is a Kel Tech P-32 (32 auto - JHP) carried in an inside the pants pocket holster. (Yes, I live in a Concealed Carry State and have all applicable permits.) It is a difficult handgun to shoot with good accuracy, but I have developed a technique that was good enough for me to qualify for the FBI close quarter qualification requirements (the standard for a Nevada CFP). I practice with it too to stay proficient.