My biggest concern is with the approach that Calguns is taking in the way they are disseminating information about the CCW initiative and encouraging people to blindly apply for permits without giving equal weight to the potential NEGATIVE impacts that doing so could have or imply.
For example, most of your posts essentially say "before you UOC apply for a CCW, here is template form..." This does not properly inform people of the implications of the current CA DOJ standard application questions and the future impacts that a denial may have on their future abilities to obtain CCWs (most apps I've seen ask if you've ever been denied a CCW or equivalent)
. While it may not completely prevent someone, it may raise red flags for the issuing authority and cause undue hassle, while the benefits of applying and being denied at this point are purely hypothetical.
My suggestion would be for Calguns to include the asterisk type comments I've described in your posts where you recommend to 2A newcomers so that they are not blind sided down the road. It would show that you have a strategy, but also understand there are certain costs in terms of constitutional rights being temporarily given up to (in your opinion) make way for greater 2A victories down the road.