stainless1911
Banned
I frequently find bullets on the surface at the range, some of them in suprisingly good shape. I just melt them down and reuse them.
I frequently find bullets on the surface at the range, some of them in suprisingly good shape. I just melt them down and reuse them.
The surface of what? (Hopefully not your skin...lol)
Stop the arguing and just get a 10mm
135 gr (8.7 g) Underwood Nosler JHP 1,600 ft/s (490 m/s) 767 ft·lbf (1,040 J)
200 gr (13 g) DoubleTap W.F.N.G.C. Hard Cast 1,300 ft/s (400 m/s) 750 ft·lbf (1,020 J)
Even a shot to the head by a seemingly "adequate" round may not be effective. I have to find it but I read a local news story where a young man placed a revolver to his head, pulled the rigger, and had a .44mag enter under his skin and travel up to the top of his head and then exit. He was found walking around his front yard somewhat dazed but not in any way seriously injured. So, when one talks about "effectiveness", so many possible variables are involved that one is truly talking about probabilities. Caliber of the round is only one factor in determining that probability... albeit a fairly significant one.
lol. Just on the ground, lying there right on top of it. Someone gave me an old metal detector, so I spent a couple hours today finding lost brass, and a few pieces of lead.
One shot of .22LR to the head would be more effective than 10 shots of .50 BMG to the legs, does that mean that .22LR is more effective than .50 BMG?