I am reading you correctly if you know the meaning of the word "Pedantry"
In most cases it is somewhat meant as a put down.
I don't really think it is productive to argue semantics, and I usually stay away from doing so. However, I agree with Kix's "Can't we all get along?" statement, so allow me to explain my usage of 'pedantry'.
As defined, a 'bill' is 'proposed legislation'. Upcoming means 'approaching: of the relatively near future'. So, yes. We can expect proposed legislation in the relatively near future (likely in January of February from what I know).
As I have indicated, you are correct that it is not currently a bill, in that it has not yet been officially proposed by a legislator, and that it is possible (although not at all likely) it may never make it to a bill. All evidence and conversation I have seen shows quite a bit of legislative support for the proposal.
So again, I fully admit that you are correct, and I corrected my wording to make anyone who felt wronged by my wording feel better. However, this is a very good example of a focus on trivial edges to an issue. A focus that is, in my opinion, not productive. If you take that as insulting, then that surely is your choice because again, I have not made any comment that was meant to be insulting. But please do remember that I sided with your correction of my wording and corrected it. Stating that I am trying to mislead anyone here by using the razor's edge of scrutiny in wording options is hyperbole at best.
Lets try and stay productive and not spend our time questioning people's motives or choice of wording unless there is actually something at stake.