Michigander
Regular Member
True, although I would vote to make politicians take 4 extensive polygraph tests per year.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Most asinine proposed gun law yet
- Thread starter scot623
- Start date
True, although I would vote to make politicians take 4 extensive polygraph tests per year.
ak56
Campaign Veteran
No, they would put the tracking devices on the guns. That way, if they were to come within 1000' of us, they would send thier security details to come and arrest us.
1245A Defender
Regular Member
ohh ohh,,,
make the politicos wear shock collars, make our guns the invisible pet fence.
if they get to close to a lawfully armed citizen, Zap, and they go away!
make the politicos wear shock collars, make our guns the invisible pet fence.
if they get to close to a lawfully armed citizen, Zap, and they go away!
stainless1911
Banned
Now THAT I like :banana:
Bronson
Regular Member
The father of the murdered 9 yr old girl has already spoken out against further restrictions on fundamental rights, and is being raked over the coals for it by the left.
http://www.infowars.com/leftists-attack-parents-of-murdered-9-year-old/
Bronson
stainless1911
Banned
Why am I not suprised?
Radioman
Regular Member
Here is a thought on how to combat this. If they are really going to introduce it then we should mount an information campaign against it. We simply need to start sending in letters and/or emails daily asking what the officials schedule is for the following 24 hrs. Then when they cant get anything done or have to hire 40 more staffers to handle the responses maybe just maybe they might get the hint on this one. The only drawback would be this response would probably get you put onto a no-fly-watch-cavity search-whatever list. Oh well it was a thought. Time to send off a few letters expressing my opinions on the bill to my elected officials.
Radioman
Radioman
PDinDetroit
Regular Member
I agree that we should fight misinformation with factual information.
We are probably on a few "lists" just by posting in online forums such as these.
Isn't just belonging to a forum like this get you on some list?
PDinDetroit
Regular Member
DrTodd
Michigan Moderator
Why not just just flip a coin; tails they are lying, heads they are telling the truth... it's just as accurate at roughly 50%. On the other hand, just assume that they are lying and keep the quarter.
Glock9mmOldStyle
Campaign Veteran
+1 Gazillion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh163n1lJ4M The kind we don't need.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd8wwMFmCeE&feature=related The kind we do need.
Last edited:
touchéAt least the Forum Listing...
stainless1911
Banned
tbrenke
Regular Member
yea, a mistermeaner 1000 foot crime. that will keep them from committing murder and getting the lethal injection in AZ. great idea.
stainless1911
Banned
But a magazine ban surely would have stopped him.
PDinDetroit
Regular Member
TheQ
Regular Member
nonameisgood
Regular Member
Well, we now restrict speech within 300 feet of funerals, why not geographically restrict another provision of the Bill of Rights for someone's comfort and convenience?
What's the difference?
What's the difference?