• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Pete King to Introduce Gun Safety Bill (no guns within 1000 ft of govt officials)

zack991

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
1,535
Location
Ohio, USA
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-january-12-2011/battle-of-the-bans?xrs=eml_tds

bounce.gif


Hits the nail on the head.
 

flhtcm

New member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
2
Location
Gray TN
But wait a minute..

The reason our founding fathers were careful to include the second amendment was so the people(the real government) can keep the big government in check... any law limiting any citizen's right to keep and bare arms is wholly unconstitutional. the congerss and senate should be wary of the citizenry, we are being raped by these "law-makers"..
 

Awshucks

Banned
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
25
Location
the earth
And now you know...

...why a Reform Jew was sacrificed as pretext to ensure a gun free zone around the RC majority in both Houses of the DC Legislature...whether they are in session, or merely travelling.

Rome does love to 'fail forward'.
 

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
...why a Reform Jew was sacrificed as pretext to ensure a gun free zone around the RC majority in both Houses of the DC Legislature...whether they are in session, or merely travelling.

Rome does love to 'fail forward'.

Are you seriously proposing the Loughner was acting on orders from the Vatican, or from Roman Catholic members of Congress? If there were a shred of truth to it, the media would have been all over it.

This smacks of the same conspiratorial outlandishness as the crap Loughner put out there.
 
Top