Mostly for Peter Nap, but anyone subscribing to the "cuccinelli is still our friend" camp (not lumping you in that camp P/N, nor excluding )
What exactly do you expect him to say that will somehow explain to your satisfaction his defense of GMU after lying about it? what would anyone hope to gain by letting him try to "explain it away"?
Well, let me reverse engineer those questions.
what would anyone hope to gain by letting him try to "explain it away"?
While he does talk to me on occasion, more before the election than after, he doesn't ask my permission nor requires it, so it's not a matter of "letting" him do anything.
What exactly do you expect him to say that will somehow explain to your satisfaction his defense of GMU after lying about it?
I already know what he's going to say but HE needs to say it.