billv
Regular Member
This is a bit ridiculous, don't you think?
He should have been covered under the Federal laws for traveling with firearms.
And he shouldn't have been arrested for something that was out of his control.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/18/traveling-mans-gun-arrest-appealed-supreme-court/
He should have been covered under the Federal laws for traveling with firearms.
And he shouldn't have been arrested for something that was out of his control.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/18/traveling-mans-gun-arrest-appealed-supreme-court/