Dreamer
Regular Member
How about my right to protect myself and my family? Why isn't that a good enough reason? :cuss:
NO, NO, NO!!! (according to the MSP)
The only "good and substantial reasons" are as follows:
1) you have been violently attacked before, have official police report paper trail to prove it, and you survived the attack, and even THEN, it generally depends on if you are white, rich, or well-connected enough for them to like you, or
2) you carry lots of money for your business, or
3) you carry controlled drugs for your business, or
4) you carry precious metals or valuable jewelry for your business, or
5) you are an attorney, and even THEN, it generally depends on if you are white, rich, or well-connected enough for them to like you. (Obviously Del. Smigiel doesn't meet that requirement anymore, because his renewal last year was denied--apparently he stepped on the wrong toes as a legislator...)
In MD, the lives of innocent children, wives, husbands, family members and individual citizens are NOT considered precious or valuable enough to be protected by law-abiding citizens.
But drugs, money, and gold--when carried by wealthy or well-connected individuals--are...
I think we know what their criteria are REALLY being steered by.
The "color of law" in MD is green and gold.
I don't mean nothin' by that... I'm just sayin'...
Last edited: