Did I miss something in the Goldberg case Rich? he was let go wasn't he? I was under the impression that the charges against him were dropped. Or are we talking about the suit he brought against the town? I read that transcript and it doesn't sound to me like the judge said anything about LEO's being able to do that.
The inference is that because the civil suit failed, they acted appropriately...which is incorrect. They were entitled to immunity for their reasonable if inappropriate actions. In any event, the dismissal of the charges and the fact that the civil decision was unreported makes neither determination precedential for either side, though it may indicate what might happen it binds no one to anything.
Last edited: