Outdoorsman
Regular Member
If businesses are allowed to ban firearm carry, which is essentially banning the 2nd Amendment, are they also allowed to ban other Constitutional rights? Just a thought.
If businesses are allowed to ban firearm carry, which is essentially banning the 2nd Amendment, are they also allowed to ban other Constitutional rights? Just a thought.
If businesses are allowed to ban firearm carry, which is essentially banning the 2nd Amendment, are they also allowed to ban other Constitutional rights? Just a thought.
Seems contradictory, doesn't it. Businesses seem to have the ability to kick us out, but yet no one is allowed to "interfere" with our Constitutional rights.
Cite this in law please. Where does it saw a private entity cannot interested with your constitutional right?
Ever tried screaming random crap during the middle of a showing at the local cinema?
I believe that the video I posted discusses these same issues very well...
Cite this in law please. Where does it saw a private entity cannot interested with your constitutional right?
Ever tried screaming random crap during the middle of a showing at the local cinema?
I watched it. Did I miss a law being cited?
I believe that the Constitution was being cited. That should be enough.
The Rights are Unalienable. If a business is open to the Public, they cannot take away your Rights.
Rarely is it "all or nothing". I don't believe in descrimination, but if I'm a store owner and there is a person who has/is causing problems in my business, I should have the right to tell them to leave and never come back. But for me to kick someone out because of their race, religion, Constitutional rights, etc., is wrong.
Rarely is it "all or nothing". I don't believe in descrimination, but if I'm a store owner and there is a person who has/is causing problems in my business, I should have the right to tell them to leave and never come back. But for me to kick someone out because of their race, religion, Constitutional rights, etc., is wrong.
The Constitution, again, limits our Federal Government. It doesn't limit private individuals. Until the 14th amendment came along, it didn't even limit states.
I'm sorry, my fellow patriot, your argument holds no ground in this regard.
Where does the constitution say any rights are inalienable? I don't think it does. Perhaps you are thinking instead of a document written in 1776?
1. That document holds no legal ground.
2. It's a separate document.
3. It doesn't enumerate RKBA as one of the inalienable rights.
I think once again, gentlemen, we'll have to agree to disagree on this issue.
I wish you both well and withdraw from this discussion -- still holding my own beliefs and respecting yours -- so long as you don't force it on anyone.
The Right To Keep and Bear Arms has been held as a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT (READ: NATURAL). This is simply ENUMERATED, not GRANTED, so there is no document needed, legal or otherwise. Since this is a NATURAL RIGHT, it is UNALIENABLE from a PERSON.
You challenge but then leave, that is sad sir. We all learn from friendly discussions, which this so far has been.
Thank you for acknowledging your argument only had basis in Philosophy and not Law.
Take care, my friend.