• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Obama Announces Detaining Americans for Future Crimes that Have Not Been Committed

R

Ruby

Regular Member
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
1,201
Location
Renton, Washington, USA
Since what Obama wants to do is currently illegal under our current legal system, he's going to set up his own "framework" to do this?!? Since when is he above the law?!? Why isn't Congress screaming to the rooftops about this? This means ANYONE could be accused of being a terrorist (read: gun owners) locked up and held indefinitely without being charged, without the right to counsel, without the right of a trial or appeal, etc. And our illustrious representatives (Congress) just sit there and let him do it. It's not only outside our own government and the Constitution, it's outside of the Geneva Convention. Apparently those things have no meaning or bearing for Obama. Someone ought to remind Obama that he doesn't have the power to do this.
 
NHCGRPR45

NHCGRPR45

Regular Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
1,131
Location
Chesterfield Township, MI
Ruby said:
Since what Obama wants to do is currently illegal under our current legal system, he's going to set up his own "framework" to do this?!? Since when is he above the law?!? Why isn't Congress screaming to the rooftops about this? This means ANYONE could be accused of being a terrorist (read: gun owners) locked up and held indefinitely without being charged, without the right to counsel, without the right of a trial or appeal, etc. And our illustrious representatives (Congress) just sit there and let him do it. It's not only outside our own government and the Constitution, it's outside of the Geneva Convention. Apparently those things have no meaning or bearing for Obama. Someone ought to remind Obama that he doesn't have the power to do this.
Click to expand...

No, no no. It won't be illegal! (He will make whole news laws and then he will right all those new laws!) Everything in the brackets will allow him to write laws that will allow him to change any law he dosen't like, then re-write it! Perfection!:mad:

scot623 said:
Even an Obama lover, Rachel Maddow thinks this idea is disgusting. That tells you all you need to know.
Click to expand...

Yup.
 
M

MK

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
396
Location
USA
He should give it a good strong name like, the Super Patriotic Patriot Act of Patriotism. It will surely be accepted then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top