Federal Laws. Anyone Aware of These Sweet Nuggets?

I just ran across this and figured you guys might be interested to read about this.

I was surfing the USA Carry (Concealed Carry site) and followed a link: http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/node/8639

Scrolling about 1/4 of the way down the page somone posted the following federal laws:


"No state shall convert a liberty to a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor.- Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105

...If the state converts a right into a privelege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right... with impunity.
- Shuttleworth vs City of Birmingham, Alabama 317 US 262

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no legislation which would abrogate them.
- Miranda vs Arizona 384 US 436

An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as though it had never been passed.
- Norton vs Shelby County 118 US 425"


Anyone one else aware of these pearls of wisdom?

SOURCE: http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/node/8639

Interesting.

Good luck

There are a few things I'd like to use those nuggets for. However, I'm not willing to spend time locked up to make a point. If I wasn't the sole breadwinner perhaps.

I hate writing that out because it shows I'm part of the problem too.

I Doubt Liberal Federal Courts will see it that way for Our 2nd Amendment Rights though.