• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

AP - Arkansas legislature set to vote on open carry bill

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ne..._legislation_heads_before_ark__lawmakers.html

SNIP

The proposal in Arkansas _ like laws in states that allow guns to be carried out in the open _ doesn't actually mention "open carry." It would make current restrictions apply to concealed handguns, instead of all handguns.

"Most states don't say it's legal to open carry," said Mike Stollenwerk, co-founder of a pro-gun website called OpenCarry.org. "They just don't prohibit it."

Gun laws in many of those states often stem from centuries-old ideologies, says Gary Kleck, a criminology professor at Florida State University in Tallahassee.

The thought process, Kleck says, went something like this: Honest men carry guns out in the open because they've got nothing to hide, while the criminally-inclined stow away their weapons. Hence the restrictions, like permits, on concealed guns.

. . .

Still, Stollenwerk said states should give people the choice to carry guns out in the open, even if they carry concealed weapons most of the time.
 

Attaboy

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
9
Location
Little Rock
Well, even though HB1051 was listed on the Judiciary Commitee agenda, it was announced at the opening of the meeting that because Rep. Altes had amended the bill and it had been sent back to the house for reading into record, the commitee could not suspend the rules to allow discussion today, and the bill would be discussed at a later date (to be announced).

It would have been nice for this to have been posted on the AR Legislature website, so that those who went to the meeting to speak for or against the bill would not have taken time out of their day to do so only to be inconvenienced and dispappointed. :uhoh:
 
Top