Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Ban Hi Capacity Magazines ?

  1. #1
    Regular Member Batousaii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Kitsap Co., Washington, USA

    Ban Hi Capacity Magazines ?

    This news article asks if congress should ban hi-cap mags.
    - Also has a poll we can hit.

    Have fun,
    Last edited by Batousaii; 02-12-2011 at 08:28 PM.
    ~ ENCLAVE vmc ~
    The Enclave is looking for patriotic motorcycle riders in Washington State who support liberty and freedom for all. ~ Check us out!
    * " To be swayed neither by the opponent nor by his sword is the essence of swordsmanship." - Miyamoto Musashi.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    its rigged..... your just giving them more traffic... you can make comments.

  3. #3
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    The Real World.
    No one but moonbats read U.S.NEWS (You Snooze) anyway. I voted against their insipid little poll anyway, but I don't need to read their sniveling propaganda.
    If you ladies leave my island, if you survive recruit training. You will become a minister of death, PRAYING FOR WAR...

  4. #4
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

    My response

    As a graduate of Virgian Tech, I am ashamed of the school's HUA policies which disarmed the students against a threat like Cho. I find it utterly shocking that school policy forbade the students from defending themselves against a madman like Cho.

    65% of respondants agree. Disarming law-abiding citizens is a tactic found in sentence 1 of the idiot's handbook to shoddy leadership. Limiting magazine capacities will only limit the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves while doing absolutely nothing to limit the magazines used by law-breaking criminals and nut-cases who've gone off the deep end.

    Finally, Nutter's attempt to tie assault rifles to Ft. Hood, Va Tech, and Congresswoman Giffords is utterly stupid, as ALL THREE shootings involved pistols, not assault rifles. Furthermore, they ALL involved folks who were more than off their rocker, not law-abiding citizens who have the courage and personal responsibility to arm themselves against criminals and nutcases.

    Nutter is about as certifiable as all three nuts mentioned above.
    I no longer have any confidence in the moderation or administration of this forum. Nonetheless, the First STILL protects the Second, and the Second protects the First! Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and other founding documents. If you're going to do anything at all, do it right!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts