• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

ban of Jacketed bullets?

devildoc5

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
791
Location
Somewhere over run with mud(s)
is it just me or am I reading this wrong?

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0101-0150/sb_124_bill_20110126_introduced.html

It appears as though bullets made with copper jackets are proposed to be illegal.?????

a) Has projectile or projectile core constructed entirely,
excluding the presence of traces of other substances, from one or a
combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, beryllium copper,
or depleted uranium, or any equivalent material of similar density
or hardness.

Same with tungsten bullets which as most of us know tungsten is commonly used in "lead free" bullets....
 

ConditionThree

State Pioneer
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
2,231
Location
Shasta County, California, USA
is it just me or am I reading this wrong?

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0101-0150/sb_124_bill_20110126_introduced.html

It appears as though bullets made with copper jackets are proposed to be illegal.?????



Same with tungsten bullets which as most of us know tungsten is commonly used in "lead free" bullets....

Beryllium copper isnt used for jacketing bullets. This is also one of those circumstances where the legislature in its desire to be so thorough included materials that while it has been used for armor piercing ammunition, is not in common use for that purpose.

You're leaving out some important text as it concerns the the quote as well...

16660. As used in this part, "handgun ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or armor" means any ammunition, except a shotgun shell or ammunition primarily designed for use in a rifle, that is designed primarily to penetrate capable of penetrating a body vest or body shield when discharged from a handgun, and has either of the following characteristics:

Copper jacketed hollowpoints, for instance, wont penetrate most body armor.
 

Iopencarry

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
637
Location
Oakley, California, United States
the proposed Bill, AB124 will remove the word "primarily" from this law.
That will be a huge negative for all gun owners.

As written, any bullet that can "penetrate metal or armor", will be banned.

It does not say Body Armor, it says metal or armor.

All current ammo would be banned
 

Felid`Maximus

Activist Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2007
Messages
1,714
Location
Reno, Nevada, USA
16660. As used in this part, "handgun ammunition designed
to penetrate metal or armor" means any
ammunition, except a shotgun shell, that is capable of penetrating a
body vest or body shield when discharged from a handgun ,
and has either of the following characteristics:
(a) Has projectile or projectile core constructed entirely,
excluding the presence of traces of other substances, from one or a
combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, beryllium copper,
or depleted uranium, or any equivalent material of similar density
or hardness.
(b) Is manufactured or designed, by
virtue of its shape, cross-sectional density, or any coating applied
thereto, including, but not limited to, ammunition commonly known as
"KTW ammunition," to breach or penetrate a body vest or body shield
when fired from a pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being
concealed upon the person.
...
(c) As used in this section, "body vest" means any
bullet-resistant material intended to provide ballistic and trauma
protection for the wearer.

It appears shotgun shells are exempt. If you take the worst manufactured ballistic vests, that would mean that most ammunition would penetrate. (a) what does "similar density or hardness" mean? (b) how do you determine if it was manufactured or designed, even not primarily, to puncture a vest? Does the capability alone infer that?
 
Last edited:

Gundude

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
1,691
Location
Sandy Eggo County
I would like my ammo to be able to penetrate a vest. Maybe every other round is AP. Let's not forget the great Hollywood shootout.
 

devildoc5

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
791
Location
Somewhere over run with mud(s)
I was not aware what specific type of copper was used in making jackets (can someone cite please? Sounds like it would be informational to find out.) however I do know that tungsten is used extensively in the REQUIRED (in CA at least for hunting in most areas) "evironmentally friendly" bullet. So this law would also create a double standard.

Whereby you have to have it to hunt, but you cant have it because it is illegal....
 

realityfatality

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
56
Location
orange, california
I was not aware what specific type of copper was used in making jackets (can someone cite please? Sounds like it would be informational to find out.) however I do know that tungsten is used extensively in the REQUIRED (in CA at least for hunting in most areas) "evironmentally friendly" bullet. So this law would also create a double standard.

Whereby you have to have it to hunt, but you cant have it because it is illegal....

Looks like those poor endangered california condor are going to go extinct at lawmakers expense. That's the price of doing "gods work" and controling american citizens firepower. That was the main reason for those "enviromentally friendly" bullets.
 

devildoc5

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
791
Location
Somewhere over run with mud(s)
Looks like those poor endangered california condor are going to go extinct at lawmakers expense. That's the price of doing "gods work" and controling american citizens firepower. That was the main reason for those "enviromentally friendly" bullets.


Or more likely here in the PRK is that hunting will go away. We wouldn't want to hurt some poor defenseless creature remember?

Unfortunately that includes the predatory kind as well both the 4 legged kind like cougars and the 2 legged drug dealing pimp crack heads that try to rob you/rape your gf....
 
Last edited:

realityfatality

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
56
Location
orange, california
Or more likely here in the PRK is that hunting will go away. We wouldn't want to hurt some poor defenseless creature remember?

Unfortunately that includes the predatory kind as well both the 4 legged kind like cougars and the 2 legged drug dealing pimp crack heads that try to rob you/rape your gf....

Theese things only effect law abiding citizens, not criminals. Poachers don't care about defenseless creatures.
 
Top