I totally disagree with the concept of being a "prior victim" as having some sort of justification. If I'm a contractor who has work to do in a certain neighborhood (lets say for example I'm a plumber), and two weeks ago an electrician was robbed at gun point, or beaten and mugged, at the same work sight I'm now going to, does this count as justification for me too... or just the "prior victim"?
My profession is as a locksmith. I know 3 other locksmiths who were the victims of armed robberies after responding to requests for service that were nothing but a ruse to facillitate an ambush. Does this justify me to carry every time I go on a service call? Not according to this judge's logic, until I too am mugged or robbed.
In the Hamdan ruling, the Supreme Court said it was "OK" to CC in your business premises. For a contractor, like a locksmith as I am, or an electricion, plumber, carpenter, roofer, salesman, or any other business that requires traveling, your work sight IS your business premises.... but I doubt the Supreme Court would see it that way, which is why we need the current bullcrap laws changed to conform to the State's RKBA Amendment so no "interpretation" by a court of law is necessary to exercise your rights.
