pmocek
New member
The person about whom I made the comment, "Wow. Showing ID would be less intrusive than what that passenger went through," was not you. [...]
My point was that the additional hassles of trying to fly without ID are more intrusive than the requirement for ID.
Oh, I see. Unless you're employed by them, it's nearly impossible to determine just what TSA's policies are. But from what we can gather, prior to mid-2008, presenting documentation of your identity ("showing ID") at the airport simply bought you a less-intrusive search, and now it also buys you the removal of a requirement that you answer a bunch of questions that only you (and Choicepoint or whatever company they use to come up with the questions and expected answers) would know the answers to.
Following is something I wrote elsewhere (FlyerTalk Forums, "TSA's airline passenger identification policies") about what I've gathered:
What are the rules concerning airline passenger identification by TSA?
Although TSA refuses to publish all the rules they require passengers to follow at airport checkpoints, from what we can distill from TSA press releases, heavily-redacted information obtained via FOIA requests, TSA blog posts, and other information they publish on the Web, it's relatively clear that your boarding pass is all the documentation that's ever required for domestic flights. It seems that passengers are not required to present documentation of their identities to TSA staff, and that doing so is not a condition of crossing the TSA checkpoint, but rather is an option which allows passengers to cross the checkpoint with a less-thorough search of their belongings and fewer questions to answer.
TSA doesn't publish the rules they require us to follow, but the Freedom of Information Act should allow us to see those rules, right?
TSA's FOIA officer, Kevin J. Janet, doesn't seem to think so.
In June, 2009, I placed a FOIA request for TSA's Screening Management Standard Operating Procedures Manual, which upon their request, I clarified to mean, "a written description of procedures [TSA's] staff use at airport checkpoints when searching and interrogating people who are stopped by [their] staff at those checkpoints." I wanted to know how our federal airport security guards are instructed to do their jobs of ensuring compliance with the rules passengers are required to follow in order to avoid having their movement restricted. Nearly 13 months later, after much stalling and repeated reports that my request was undergoing various review processes, my request was denied in full.
TSA refuses to let us read the rules they require us to follow. So what do we know about their I.D. policies?
According to a 2008 press release from TSA, TSA's airport passenger identification policy changed on June 21, 2008, but "showing I.D." was seemingly not required before and is seemingly not required now.
Prior to June 21, 2008
Before June 21, 2008, the situation seemed to be: In order to proceed to the "secure area" of an airport after being stopped at a TSA barricade, each passenger must submit to a pat-down and search for metallic objects using a hand-held metal detector, along with a hand-searching of any carry-on baggage, unless he presents documentation of his identity (i.e., unless he "shows I.D."), in which case he must submit only to a search for metallic objects on his person via walk-through metal detector and search of any carry-on baggage using an X-ray machine.
In other words: back then, showing I.D. simply got you a less-thorough search than you'd otherwise receive.
Now
Beginning June 21, 2008, the situation seems to be: Each passenger still has the option of showing I.D. and participating in the less-thorough searches (walk-through metal detector and X-raying of carry-ons), but the alternative now involves not only being thoroughly searched for dangerous items, but also identifying oneself verbally and participating in an interrogation intended to verify one's identity (via phone call from Homeland Security headquarters). Chillingly, it seems from the aforementioned TSA press release that this alternative also requires that someone be "cooperative with officers". What that cooperation entails is not defined.
Initial reports from TSA indicated that while people who claimed that their government-issued I.D. card was misplaced or stolen would be allowed to take the alternate route through the checkpoint (with the questioning), those who willfully refused to show their papers would be barred from proceeding. It's unclear whether or not this is still the case, or if it was ever the case, as TSA's initial press release seems, based on information received from TSA via Freedom of Information Act request, to have been inaccurate.
Summary of present situation and how to exploit it
In short, best we can tell, complying with TSA's "papers, please!" request is not necessary in order to fly domestically, it's simply a way to avoid the hassle of a thorough search for dangerous items, the hassle of providing convincing information in support of your claim to be who you say you are, and having to cooperate with TSA airport staff in any manner they see fit.
This is a great system for people who wish to do harm in airports or on airplanes, since getting a falsified identification document (i.e., a "fake I.D.") is relatively simple, and presentation of one almost guarantees that TSA staff will look at someone with less scrutiny, making it easier for him to take weapons, explosives, or incendiaries past the security checkpoint. Even if TSA could detect such fraud with perfect accuracy, using the Carnival Booth Algorithm, terrorists can probe an identity-based security system like TSA's by sending a number of people on harmless trips through the system, noting who is flagged for extra searches and who isn't. Then they can send those who aren't flagged -- people who almost certainly will get through security with a less-thorough search -- on terrorist missions.
Why does TSA want to identify us? What's wrong with them doing so?
This isn't about your safety. It's about control -- a few people's control over the rest of us.
The primary reason that TSA wants to know who you are is their desire to restrict people's movement based on Homeland Security blacklists. As did every government that has imposed totalitarian rules, TSA repeatedly tells us that their freedom-restricting policies are about safety, security, and rooting out subversives. Of course, this policy is really about extra-judicial punishment, allowing our executive branch of government to sidestep our judicial branch and punish someone for any reason or no reason at all. That's not the way things are supposed to work in the United States. It's ripe for abuse, and it's an infringement on our freedom.
For more on showing I.D. in the general sense, please see the Identity Project's "What's Wrong With Showing I.D.?" page.
The problem here stems from the use of ID as an abbreviation for both identity and identity card.
I cringe every time I use the term "ID". It can mean identity, identification (the process), or documentation of identity (to which we often, confusingly, refer to as "identification"). Imagine dealing with a police officer who demands that you "give him your ID" when you have no such documentation with you. In the case of my arrest at ABQ, it was very clear that the officer wanted a document, because he kept telling me to get it, warning me that he'd search my bags for it, etc.
The law makes no mention of documentation of identity, just identity.
That depends on which law you're talking about.
To have broken that law, Mr. Mocek would have had to refuse to share his name with the TSA agent.
To have broken New Mexico's concealing identity law, it seems I would have neglected to identify myself once the officer was lawfully investigating me based on his suspicion that I'd violated the law. The jury in my case had to determine if Officer Dilley had reason to remove me from the airport (he did not) and if so, whether I refused to do so (I did not, though there was some question of whether the three-ish seconds from when he said, "alright, let's go," until I can be seen moving in the video constituted refusal to obey him). Of the four charges, concealing identity was the most complicated to deal with.
I'm not positive, and I wish it was not the case, but I think that under certain circumstances, people are required to identify themselves to police in New Mexico there even if an officer has not demanded or requested that they do so.
[Mocek's name] was on his ticket. Or, that name would have to have been false. We now know that is not the case.
Correct. You could say the same for any document I could have presented, though some are harder to falsify than others. Falsification of any of them is well within the capabilities of a determined criminal.
Clearly, the officers thought that not showing documentation of identity violated the NM law. Clearly it does not. (As it would not in Alabama.)
Nowhere in the United States are we required to have documentation of identity. It's my understanding, though, that in some jurisdictions, under some circumstances, we are required to show it to a police officer if we have it on us.