• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

American Legion in Bath, MI Bans Firearms

springerdave

Regular Member
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
665
Location
Northern lower & Keweenaw area, Michigan, USA
The board voted on it and they told me it couldn't be changed unless the person that made the motion wanted it to be....Yes they said that. Seems to me that any board member can make a motion to repeal it and they can vote again.

I would think that it will be in effect until a new board is voted in and a motion is made to rescind it. I can only hope. That is why any pressure that people put on them could influence that decision.

I have not heard anything from National and don't expect I will. Most likely National will leave it up to each post.

It's just really sad and pitiful

Hey Venator, see if you can latch onto a copy of the by-laws and make sure they followed procedure.springerdave.
 

PDinDetroit

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
2,328
Location
SE, Michigan, USA
The board voted on it and they told me it couldn't be changed unless the person that made the motion wanted it to be....Yes they said that. Seems to me that any board member can make a motion to repeal it and they can vote again.

I would think that it will be in effect until a new board is voted in and a motion is made to rescind it. I can only hope. That is why any pressure that people put on them could influence that decision.

I have not heard anything from National and don't expect I will. Most likely National will leave it up to each post.

It's just really sad and pitiful

Are the utilizing Robert's Rules of Order? If so, a Motion to Reconsider could have been done by anyone who voted on the prevailing side in the original vote. They can bring another motion next meeting to rescind that other action, unless there was a moratorium of some sort established.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconsideration_of_a_motion
 

DrTodd

Michigan Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,272
Location
Hudsonville , Michigan, USA
Are the utilizing Robert's Rules of Order? If so, a Motion to Reconsider could have been done by anyone who voted on the prevailing side in the original vote. They can bring another motion next meeting to rescind that other action, unless there was a moratorium of some sort established.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconsideration_of_a_motion

Definitely worth a try, but I would be somewhat surprised if the board actually had anyone on it that knew the procedure... but you never know, maybe they do.

Most organizations use a "modified" Robert's Rules of Order (RONR). I was trained in RONR years ago and if I try to use it in any deliberation, I get some pretty hostile responses... but it could be just me
:)
 

DrTodd

Michigan Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,272
Location
Hudsonville , Michigan, USA
Are the utilizing Robert's Rules of Order? If so, a Motion to Reconsider could have been done by anyone who voted on the prevailing side in the original vote. They can bring another motion next meeting to rescind that other action, unless there was a moratorium of some sort established.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconsideration_of_a_motion

Definitely worth a try, but I would be somewhat surprised if the board actually had anyone on it that knew the procedure... but you never know, maybe they do.

Most organizations use a "modified" Robert's Rules of Order (RONR). I was trained in RONR years ago and if I try to use it in any deliberation I get some pretty hostile responses... but it could be just me
:)
 

autosurgeon

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
3,831
Location
Lawrence, Michigan, United States
Yeah I use Roberts Rules for my planning commission meetings and people really get worked up when I enforce the rules and stop the useless chatter. Not to mention what happens when I enforce the motion on the table discussion rules! :banana:
 

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
Response from National. Interesting they claim to have no power over posts. Seems odd as then a post could engage in activities contrary to the national organizations policies.

Brian-
Thank you for contacting The American Legion National Headquarters with your question. The National Organization is unable to get involved in any activities at the Post level as per our National Constitution and By-Laws. Departments (state headquarters) of The American Legion have a general oversight, but not day-to-day operational responsibility, over the Posts within the Department. The National Organization does not have even this general oversight.

Furthermore, the American Legion is a grassroots organization. More importantly, the gun laws are covered by local and state ordinances and laws, each of which varies drastically throughout the country.

I would recommend contacting the Department of Michigan state headquarters at 517-371-4720 to see what the state of Michigan allows in their American Legion posts. Thank you and have a great weekend.

Scott A. Miller
Assistant Director, Internal Affairs and Membership
The American Legion
317-630-1269
www.legion.org
 
Last edited:

WARCHILD

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
1,768
Location
Corunna, Michigan, USA
Don't ya just love "political" answers that side step the issue and don't answer a damn thing but just pass the buck.

ETA:
Gettin close Brian...you break 5,000 posts...I'll buy you lunch.
 
Last edited:

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
Liver and onions it is. There's a nice place here local to get them too. Of course you will have to come to Owosso to get it. :cool:

BTW: It does not include you making "countdown" posts to complete the task. :rolleyes:

Sounds good, we should go even if I never reach 5000. I know you like liver and onions as well. :banana:
 

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
Well here is what the Michigan HQ's has to say.

Brian,
Thank you for your e-mail regarding Post #412 Bath. Please understand that all Michigan American Legion Posts are autonomous and Department Headquarters has no authority on the Post level, unless the Post is violating our Dept or National Constitution and By-Laws.- in other words each post sets and enforces their own rules. If this ban is with Post activities and programs I would suggest you take your concerns to the Post Executive Committee, but if its a Club Room issue, I would suggest talking to your "Club Board". The American Legion has always supported the right to bear arms, but this is a decision of your Post leadership, but if enough members support your opinion maybe the Post will reconsider their position? Sorry I couldn't be of more assistance to you


Pat Lafferty, Dept Adjutant
 

Onnie

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Messages
664
Location
Maybee, Michigan
Well here is what the Michigan HQ's has to say.

Brian,
Thank you for your e-mail regarding Post #412 Bath. Please understand that all Michigan American Legion Posts are autonomous and Department Headquarters has no authority on the Post level, unless the Post is violating our Dept or National Constitution and By-Laws.- in other words each post sets and enforces their own rules. If this ban is with Post activities and programs I would suggest you take your concerns to the Post Executive Committee, but if its a Club Room issue, I would suggest talking to your "Club Board". The American Legion has always supported the right to bear arms, but this is a decision of your Post leadership, but if enough members support your opinion maybe the Post will reconsider their position? Sorry I couldn't be of more assistance to you


Pat Lafferty, Dept Adjutant

I think Aurthur Murry's Dance dance studio still teaches the side step. Maybe that's where he learned it from:(
 

Jared

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
892
Location
Michigan, USA
I'm curious, why the double standard? Why is "private property" in Michigan able to be marked as a gun free zone, but the same "private property" can not allow smoking??? Ask the VFW about this....

It's hypocritical... I heard the same nonsense from Arizona (which has banned smoking for 4 years) when I lived there.

Is it unreasonable to ask for consistency, if they state is in the business of telling property owners how to conduct their business, then they should not be allowed to ban firearms. If there is a government nexus, then the constitution should apply.
 

karlmc10

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
28
Location
Gaylord, Michigan, USA
I'm curious, why the double standard? Why is "private property" in Michigan able to be marked as a gun free zone, but the same "private property" can not allow smoking??? Ask the VFW about this....

It's hypocritical... I heard the same nonsense from Arizona (which has banned smoking for 4 years) when I lived there.

Is it unreasonable to ask for consistency, if they state is in the business of telling property owners how to conduct their business, then they should not be allowed to ban firearms. If there is a government nexus, then the constitution should apply.

The ban on smoking was not a private property issue but a workplace issue. The smoking ban was to keep workers free from second hand smoke. You can smoke in your home all you want. Private property owners can ban firearms on thier property because it's private property. If you don't like the firearms ban on a business' property then don't give them your money. Workers don't have the same ability when dealing with second hand smoke. I agree that it's crazy that the Legion has a ban on firearms, so I would not frequent the place nor give them any money, but I'm not a member. If I were a member I would either work to get it changed or renounce my membership.
The smoking ban and the ban on firearms on private property are two completely different issues, one is a support of workers rights to a healthy workplace the other an issue of private property rights. Remember, when on my land your rights are to breath and get off my land, all other actions are with my blessing.
 

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
The ban on smoking was not a private property issue but a workplace issue. The smoking ban was to keep workers free from second hand smoke. You can smoke in your home all you want. Private property owners can ban firearms on thier property because it's private property. If you don't like the firearms ban on a business' property then don't give them your money. Workers don't have the same ability when dealing with second hand smoke. I agree that it's crazy that the Legion has a ban on firearms, so I would not frequent the place nor give them any money, but I'm not a member. If I were a member I would either work to get it changed or renounce my membership.
The smoking ban and the ban on firearms on private property are two completely different issues, one is a support of workers rights to a healthy workplace the other an issue of private property rights. Remember, when on my land your rights are to breath and get off my land, all other actions are with my blessing.

Not really. A worker is free to find another job just as a person is free to not patronize an anti-gun business. See?

The point is, if a Government can delegate what a private business owner can and can not do (Smoking ban), then they can force them to allow firearms, a right enumerated in the Constitution. Smoking is a right, but is not specifically enumerated.

Both issues use the excuse of safety, but safety is the tyrants tool, for who can be against safety.
 

eastmeyers

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
1,363
Location
Hazel Park, Michigan, USA
Not really. A worker is free to find another job just as a person is free to not patronize an anti-gun business. See?

The point is, if a Government can delegate what a private business owner can and can not do (Smoking ban), then they can force them to allow firearms, a right enumerated in the Constitution. Smoking is a right, but is not specifically enumerated.

Both issues use the excuse of safety, but safety is the tyrants tool, for who can be against safety.

Also if they can force you allow for clean lungs, they can force you to allow for someone to defend their own life. Can't have it both ways, oh wait they are the government.
 
Top