• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

examiner.com - DC Crime museum promotes unhelpful firearm stereotypes

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-...museum-promotes-unhelpful-firearm-stereotypes

SNIP

The National Crime and Punishment Museum on 7th Street N.W. in the District is a popular venue for District tourists and residents. I went there a few months ago to check it out . . . But a . . . disturbing issue is that the museum's displays consistently omit any acknowledgement of, as the U.S. Supreme Court noted in United States v. Staples (1994), the "long history of lawful gun ownership by citizens in this country." Nor among the museum's vast collections is there any mention of the continuing common law right of citizen's arrest, the open and concealed carry movements, or . . .
 

NovaCop

New member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
471
Location
, ,
http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-...museum-promotes-unhelpful-firearm-stereotypes

SNIP

The National Crime and Punishment Museum on 7th Street N.W. in the District is a popular venue for District tourists and residents. I went there a few months ago to check it out . . . But a . . . disturbing issue is that the museum's displays consistently omit any acknowledgement of, as the U.S. Supreme Court noted in United States v. Staples (1994), the "long history of lawful gun ownership by citizens in this country." Nor among the museum's vast collections is there any mention of the continuing common law right of citizen's arrest, the open and concealed carry movements, or . . .

Ummm... well... it is a museum for "CRIME and punishment". I wouldn't expect a museum with that title to incorporate "legal gun ownership" into their exhibits. An "open carry" section in the museum? I guess the same could be said about why they didn't have an exhibit portraying "freedom of speech", etc. etc. Take the museum as it is... a crime museum. Not a museum to show legalization of fundamental rights.

I have enjoyed this museum, as many others have. I understand there are guns on display..but they correlate with crimes that were committed. I will continue to visit this museum.

P.S.,I think there is a NRA museum that shows exactly what you are eluding to just off route 66, not far by.
 
Last edited:

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Ummm... well... it is a museum for "CRIME and punishment". I wouldn't expect a museum with that title to incorporate "legal gun ownership" into their exhibits. An "open carry" section in the museum? I guess the same could be said about why they didn't have an exhibit portraying "freedom of speech", etc. etc. Take the museum as it is... a crime museum. Not a museum to show legalization of fundamental rights.

I have enjoyed this museum, as many others have. I understand there are guns on display..but they correlate with crimes that were committed. I will continue to visit this museum.

So you think that it is perfectly alright for them to disseminate faulty, inaccurate information? "Semi-automatic firearms, the most commonly purchased handguns in America for over a decade, must be registered with the federal government."

Or to ignore that many have been "punished" when their only "crime" was being a legal citizen not in accord with the personal opinion of someone in authority.

Unfortunately, I would have expected no less from you.
 
Top